Posts Tagged ‘David Amess MP’

Alastair Welch: Meeting constituents

Monday, April 27th, 2009

London Southend Airport

27th April 2009

David Amess MP
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

Dear Mr Amess MP,

Thank you for your letter dated 18th April addressed to Mr E Stobart, inviting him to meet with a group of your constituents with concerns about the airport expansion.

I am afraid that Eddie Stobart retired from the business many years ago and Stobart Group plc is led by our Chief Executive Andrew Tinkler.

You may recall from our earlier correspondence that I have myself been trying to arrange a private meeting for some time with Kiti Theobald, chairman of an anti expansion group, although to date she has declined these invitations.

Having spoken with Andrew Tinkler, might we suggest that in principle we would be very happy to join you in a private meeting with your constituents and suggest the meeting may best be held in your offices in London to suit you.

As you will appreciate, it would be helpful to understand who the constituents are and any particular concerns you are aware of in advance of any such meeting.

If you would be supportive of this approach, perhaps your office could liaise with Nicola Charles on 01702 608### and we look forward to making the appropriate arrangements.

With kind regards

Yours sincerely

Alastair Welch
Managing Director

David Amess MP: 16 reasons to oppose the runway extension

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

21st April 2009

Re Southend Aiport runway extension

Dear Mr Amess,

With the runway currently just half a mile from densely populated areas
such as Westcliff-on-Sea and Leigh-on-Sea, how can anyone even dream of
extending the runway? Perhaps such an idea had to be mooted just to make
the airport a viable proposition before selling it for a song.

Nevertheless, £21m is still a lot of money so anyone who spends such a
figure on a venture is going to expect to get their way one way or
another. Therefore, I really do fear that this “…we really are
interested in your views…” attitude from the Council is a farce as many
unpopular decisions to do with the airport expansion have already be made
and already put in motion.

Despite reading much of the JAAP report I fail to see what the proposed
expansion really has to offer this area though I can think of a long list
of negatives:

  1. Firstly, John Prescott’s ill-conceived directive of one million more
    homes in the Thames Gateway corridor up to Cambridge when there is already
    an inadequate supply of water for inhabitants of that area would ensure
    Southend couldn’t cope with the proposed movement of a further 2,000,000
    people.
  2. Loss of animal habitats.
  3. Loss of grazing areas.
  4. Loss of greenbelt.
  5. Loss of privacy.
  6. Increased aircraft noise night and day.
  7. Increased traffic noise night and day.
  8. Increased damage to road surfaces, kerbs, drains etc. due to heavier
    traffic.
  9. Increase in road accidents due to the extra traffic.
  10. Increased threat of terrorism.
  11. The claimed expansion of job vacancies would benefit newcomers more
    than locals.
  12. Industrial units popping up everywhere are blights on the landscape.
  13. More pollution of the senses – smell, hearing and sight.
  14. Increased criminal acts must be expected with increased population.
  15. Property devaluation – will we be compensated?
  16. Unpopular decisions cost votes.

Do we need movement of a further 2,000,000 people in this congested corner
of the UK, which is the aim, and why would travellers want to come to
Southend in their droves just because the airport has been enlarged?

Finally, I will add that earlier this week I was woken at 2.45am by the
roar of aircraft engines yet the plane didn’t even leave the ground. I
can’t imagine what the future might hold so hope any ideas of an extension
will be dropped as I vehemently object to such a move.

I would appreciate an acknowledgement to this letter.

Thanking you in anticipation,

Yours sincerely,

I Davidson

cc. Councillor Ian Robertson
cc. Councillor Michael Grimwade

David Amess MP: Our children, our health and our environment

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Dear David Amess,

I would like to take this opportunity to oppose the expansion of Southend Airport.

I believe the expansion would produce a considerable detrimental health & environmental impact upon residents & the local area.

  • Noise pollution. If what is proposed, then the frequency of larger aircrafts would produce a significant increase in the noise pollution of this area. It would not only increase in frequency, but would also be at more unsociable hours & night times. This would result in sleepless nights for many.
  • Environmental. When we are at a time when it is crucial to decrease our “carbon footprint” then surely we should look at more environmentally friendly travel & freight solutions, rather than the use of heavy aircraft, due to their negative effects on our already fragile global climate.
  • Negative Heath Effects. Studies show that the effects of air pollution on the public could lead to increased heart & respiratory problems, including asthma. The HYENA study recently proved that noise from aircrafts can actually raise your blood pressure even when you are asleep.
  • Property prices. In an already unstable financial market, I fail to see how the council think it would be beneficial to our area to add to the reduction in house prices. I moved to Leigh on Sea as I thought it was a beautiful & peaceful area. Since I have moved here, house prices have already dropped, as in many areas. By expanding the airport, this could only lead to further drop in house prices, devaluing our wonderful Leigh on Sea.
  • Road Infrastructure. The A127 & A13 are already struggling to cope with the extent of traffic leading into Southend. This can be seen when it is tested on a sunny weekend or Bank Holiday. Our roads cannot support the tourist influx at the best of times & leave roads often almost in gridlock!
  • Most importantly, Our Children. There are many children that would be affected by the expansion. Not only would they be affected by the points raised above, but also their schooling will be upset by the noise pollution. How many of us find it difficult to concentrate with noise around us, yet we are asking our children, our future, to learn & focus with the sound of planes as background noise. This negative effect would be contributed also by the lack of sleep our children would get. A study made by Barts & The London, Queen Mary’s School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of London has suggested that exposure to aircraft noise can impair reading comprehension. The authors concluded that schools exposed to high levels of aircraft noise are not healthy educational environments. EU research has also shown that exposure to aircraft noise has negative effects on children’s cognitive development.

There are a few precious things in life that we need to invest in & take special care of; our children, our health and our environment. I pose one question to contemplate….How can the expansion of our airport enhance these? My answer is that they can’t!

Yours sincerely,

Siouxzy Prior


DAVID AMESS MP

Member of Parliament for Southend West
HOUSE OF COMMONS
LONDON SW1A 0AA

Mrs Siouxzanne L. Prior
Leigh-on-Sea
Essex

Monday, 20th April 2009

Dear Mrs Prior,

Thank you for your letter regarding Southend Airport, which I have read carefully. I absolutely understand your concern and share your anxiety about the impact on Leigh residents. The proposed expansion involves redirecting a busy road, has environmental implications and will also mean more noise disturbance, particularly for residents in Leigh such as yourself over which the new flight paths would run.

I have made my views clear to the Airport’s Managing Director Alastair Welch and will continue to watch this issue very very carefully to ensure that local residents’ interests are represented. I will also make sure your views are made known to the relevant authorities. I will contact you again as soon as I receive a response.

In the meantime, if you have any questions or think I can be of any further assistance in relation to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

With all best wishes,

Yours sincerely,

David Amess MP


DAVID AMESS MP

Member of Parliament for Southend West
HOUSE OF COMMONS
LONDON SW1A 0AA

Mrs Siouxzanne L. Prior
Leigh-on-Sea
Essex

28 April 2009

Dear Mrs Prior,

Following our recent correspondence, I have received a response from Alastair Welch, Managing Director for Southend Airport.

Please find enclosed a copy of his reply. Though the letter responds to the points you made in some detail, I entirely appreciate it is unlikely to allay your anxiety – indeed, it does not mine. I will continue to make the case that any change in the status of the airport must not detrimentally affect the welfare of local residents.

I have also sent on a copy of your letter to the Chief Executive of Southend Council and the Leader of the Council. I have made and will continue to make representations to ensure that local residents’ concerns are not only listened to, but acted upon.

If you have any questions about the letter or if you think I can be of any further assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

With all best wishes,

Yours sincerely,

David Amess MP

London Southend Airport

23rd April 2009

David Amess MP
House Of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

Dear Mr Amess,

Thank you for your letter dated 20th April in which you invite me to comment on a number of points raised by Mrs Prior of Leigh-on-Sea.

As you will appreciate, the merits of any runway extension will have to be expored as part of any future planning application and is something that the relevant authorities would have to consider at that time.

That said; your constituent raises points on a number of topics, specifically noise, pollution and road traffic which I comment on in turn:

Noise – The councils have made clear that the permitted noise levels at night (currently over 900 flights per month are permitted) would have to be dramatically reduced if any runway extension were to be approved.

CO2 – Rightly, we all have an obligation to address the impacts of global warming. Technically the emissions issue of aviation will increasingly be addressed in policy terms by EU emissions trading. That said, if we were to bring forward an application to extend the runway we would need to take account of this in any environmental impact assessment. Interestingly, today there are around 500,000 flights per year taken to Europe by people living in Southend and Rochford. These people typically drive to Stansted or Gatwick for their flights today which, itself has a big impact on CO2 emissions.

Road traffic – whilst I have yet to see the Councils’ traffic assessment, the airport at 2 million passengers – which we envisage could be in 10-15 years time – would, in the peak hour result in around 240 passenger related road movements per hour in each direction. The peak hours fall before the morning roads peak and after the evening roads peak. In addition, the peak movements per hour – under 500 – is around the number associated at the peak hour with a typical supermarket – and very significantly less than that associated with a major superstore.

The current council consultation relates to planning policy and as such is somewhat general in certain aspects – what is clear however, is that the two local councils’ preferred option sees Southend as an airport eventually achieving a maximum of 2 million passengers per annum – around 10% of the current size of Stansted or 3% of Heathrow. My hope is that we can serve the local population with high quality facilities, which allows them to fly from their local airport.

Today, the residents of Rochford and Southend alone make around 500,000 journeys to Europe by air each year. If the European flights from residents in Castle Point and Basildon are added this total is over 900,000. Far from being a London overspill, we see this being an airport to serve the local community.

Finally, the benefits of a successful local airport are, I believe, of very considerable value to the area. The additional on-airport employment will be considerable with over 1,000 additional jobs in ten years time. The inward investment arising from the improved access to Europe is of significant benefit and we believe the airport can play a central role in the regeneration and transformation of Southend and the broader South Essex corridor for the future.

I hope you find this helpful.

Kind regards,

Yours sincerely,

Alastair Welch
Managing Director

David Amess MP: Chasing a response to letter of 30th January

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009
SAEN
PO Box 5909
Southend-on-Sea MLO
Short St
Southend-on-Sea
SS1 1AA

http://www.saen.org.uk
committee@saen.org.uk

Stop Airport Extension Now

3rd March 2009

Mr. David Amess MP,
Member for Southend West,
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA

Dear Mr. Amess,

We refer to our letter to you of the 30th January 2009 in relation to our continuing concerns with matters as they are rapidly evolving at Southend Airport and to which we do not appear to have received your kind reply.

You will know since our letter that both Rochford and Southend Councils have published their Preferred Options Document favouring the high-growth (Scenario 3) option and previously enshrined a public consultation process within the associated Joint Area Action Plan.

There are already reasons as expressed to you for believing that process is now highly suspect and they are completely reinforced when it is clear from the analysis conducted by Rochford’s own planning department that the majority view has been ignored in pronouncing the preference.

This is a matter seriously prejudicial to local democracy and we must ask for your assistance in drawing the attention of the public to it and use of your influence with the authorities involved in rectification.

Copies are attached of our latest letters to Mr. Cutmore and Mr. Tinlin which contain further detail for your interest.

As previously mentioned, we will be happy to meet with you at your local surgery for a general discussion and await your advices at the earliest opportunity.

Yours sincerely

 

Kiti Theobald (Chairman)

David Amess MP: General concerns about developments at Southend Airport

Friday, January 30th, 2009
SAEN
PO Box 5909
Southend-on-Sea MLO
Short St
Southend-on-Sea
SS1 1AA

http://www.saen.org.uk
committee@saen.org.uk

Stop Airport Extension Now

30th January 2009

Mr. David Amess MP,
Member for Southend West,
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA

Dear Mr. Amess,

We are writing again of our continuing concerns with matters as they are developing at Southend Airport.

You were kind enough to contact Geoff Hoon on our behalf which prompted a response from Jim Fitzpatrick at the Department for Transport in November.

This reiterated the intentions of the 2003 White paper to support the expansion of our airport with the opportunity ’to provide services to meet local demand’ and with the following caveat-

‘…..that it’s owner and operator Regional Airports Ltd. conducted rigorous studies of local and regional environmental issues- including potential increases in aircraft noise and emissions- as part of any formal development proposal’

The expressed ambition of the operators is ultimately to fly 2million passengers annually which certainly does not satisfy the ‘local demand’ criteria and the only ‘rigorous studies’ conducted here must be within the highly secretive Joint Area Action Plan as sponsored by Southend and Rochford Councils in 2008.

The existence of this Plan received meaningful publicity only in Rochford and policy as to the inherent method of selection of preferred option is completely divergent between both Councils concerning the inclusion of the public in the consultation.

In our view the exercise is fatally flawed and it must be shelved pending an enquiry

The recent acquisition of the airport by Stobart has removed Mr. Walters from the equation but we are not aware of any meaningful attempts by him to fulfil his obligations on environmental issues as described above.

Admittedly, the airport did produce a ‘Noise Map’ in 2006 (a Defra requirement as the basis of a possible ‘Action Plan’ at some time in the future) but even this was formulated from a computer model and no actual noise measurement. A somewhat pointless exercise.

Mr. Welch continues as Airport managing Director under the new regime and has continually promised to work with all interested parties on mitigation measures but you will note his degree of real interest from our letter to Ms Anna Waite dated 15/12/2008.

The sale to Stobart has made clear the implications of the lack of foresight by Southend Council when deciding to allow private market ownership of a major asset in 1994.

The absence of any covering agreement allowed RAL to deny the Council any profit share or say in the choice of new buyer. Mr. Walters paid a lease premium of £1.00 and has walked away with a minimum of £16million with all the interim infrastructure improvements provided from taxpayer assets with no prospect of recovery.

A freight company which has never owned an airport before now has our 24/7 airport with an ordinary CAA licence enabling night flying.

The lease is the only effective existing local control on airport activity and also sets the basis for production of rental income to the authority. It seems that it can now be passed as an asset from hand to hand without renegotiation to the advantage of residents.

The Council as freeholders appear to have lost effective control of a major local asset into which it has poured and continues to pour huge amounts of taxpayer funds and has also placed elements of the population at serious environmental risk particularly from night flying. This must represent a dereliction of their public duty.

We have pleasure in enclosing more detailed related correspondence for your perusal as in-

  • Letter dated 27/11/08 to Mr Tinlin
  • Letter dated 15/12/08 to Anna Waite
  • Letter dated 17/12/08 to MrTinlin
  • Letter dated 19/01/09 from Mr Tinlin
  • Letter dated 29/01/09 to Mr Tinlin

It has proven impossible to obtain any response from Ms. Waite and any meaningful one from Mr. Tinlin as you will see and we are hopeful that you will intercede with both parties on our behalf to obtain specific and detailed answers to all points raised.

We will also be happy to meet with you at your local surgery for a general discussion and await your kind advices

Yours sincerely

Kiti Theobald (Chairman)

David Amess MP: Has always vigorously campaigned against expansion

Thursday, August 21st, 2003

DAVID AMESS MP
Member of Parliament for Southend West

HOUSE OF COMMONS
LONDON SW1A 0AA

Mr J M Bramble
Leigh-on-Sea
Essex

21 August 2003

 

Dear Mr Bramble.

Thank you for letting me see a copy of the letter you have written to Mrs Holland. I am very aware of what is going with regard to the proposed expansion at Southend Airport and I have always vigorously campaigned against it. I really do sympathise with you and I probably don’t have to tell you that I have received many letters on this subject.

I know that you are awaiting a response from Mrs Holland but I will also make representations on your behalf to the appropriate Government Minister regarding this matter and will, of course, let you see a copy of any response which I may receive.

With all good wishes.

Yours sincerely,

 

DAVID AMESS MP