Archive for the ‘Media’ Category

Noise, congestion and pollution

Friday, August 27th, 2010

JANICE Price (Aug 13) may look forward to the airport expansion, that is her prerogative, but there must be thousands of residents who do not agree, and she does not speak for the community, thank goodness.

I ran a business in “a major business hub town”, (her words) and on retirement I looked for, and found a retirement home in Southend.

I found peace and tranquility, away from the hustle and bustle of business hub towns and most of my neighbours share my views.

There is no doubt airports bring noise, congestion and pollution, particularly on take-off. I know Southend has always had an airfield, and light aircraft are often seen over Southend, but to compare this with a major airport is being really naïve.

I compliment Southend West MP David Amess for looking after our welfare, and I hope he will be able to help us retain this “oasis in a busy world”, which we call Southend.

Finally, it will provide jobs, but for whom, will these jobs go to Southend residents? Prosperity goes to the entrepreneurs, not necessarily to the residents. We should have a public inquiry, so that every one can have his or her say.

DERRICK WEAVER
The Broadway
Thorpe Bay

Expanding the airport will do nothing for Southend

Friday, August 27th, 2010

JANICE Price voices an opinion on Southend Airport’s expansion that will have its supporters, but her voice is not shared by all.

She mentions the town’s failure to flourish because of a parochial mentality. Well, this mentality had no influence over industry that had previously flourished in the area, but has sadly gone because it failed to compete in the world at large.

There is little to attract business to Southend as there are so many empty shops, industrial units looking for tenants and unsold buildings and development sites.

Expanding the airport will do nothing for these, or, in fact, tourism.

Her reference to the dark ages is in some ways rather apt as repression has often been followed by revolt.

Southend Council, through its repressive behaviour, now has a revolt on hits hands, or at least concerned residents are showing democracy has not yet died.

G E HARVEY
North Crescent, Prittlewell

The noise is horrendous

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Do the advocates of an extended airport at Southend know what this means?

As I write, a single helicopter is circling Westcliff.

The noise is horrendous.

Imagine regular flights day and night into Southend Airport.

Can we learn nothing from the battle against a third runway at Heathrow?

Same old story – business before people.

Ralph Walker
Holland Road
Westcliff

Campaign against runway

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

From: Graham Whitehead, director of SAEN.

I have just listened to the interview with Denis from SAEN on Radio Essex this morning.

I agree with Denis that the Extension of the runway would allow even larger, heavier jets to use the airport. The noise that these jets make will really affect the houses & schools under the flight path.

With the runway extension, some of these heavy jets, whether passenger, freight or mixed, could be as low as 77 feet above some of the expensive houses in Leigh-on-Sea. Of course, as the airport operates 24 hours, this will be day and night.

They do say they will restrict night flights, but the restrictions only apply to some types of planes and those not covered are still very noisy. I believe that the majority of the current night flights would not be covered by these restrictions.

It is good to hear that David Amess also backs SAEN in their campaign to get the planning permission quashed.

As he said on the radio: “Had there been a different government in power, it is very likely that a public inquiry would have taken place” (not a direct quote, I cannot write that fast). Instead it appears that the Minister’s desk was cleared with understandable haste when the election was announced.

So I am not accused of trying to hide my identity I am one of the directors of SAEN Ltd and an active campaigner against the runway extension.

The ‘Barmy Bunch’ on the Council ignoring our night flight fears

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

by COUN PETER WEXHAM
Lib Dem Councillor for Leigh

WHEN talking about football Jimmy Greaves used to say: “It’s a funny old game”.

Well, I am coming to the same conclusion about politics. People say to me they did not vote Lib-Dem to get a Tory Goverment to which I say “Nor did I.”

But it was the result that the people over the whole country gave to the MPs. Labour could not form a Government even with Uncle Tom Cobley and all.

This comes a bit hard for me having spent my whole life fighting against the Conservatives and what they stand for.

However, I do believe politicians should all try to work together for the residents we were elected to support and represent.

Now, for example, I find I am working with Conservative MP David Amess over the airport extension and the night fights we, in Leigh, will have to put up with when every other airport is closed at night.

It will be open house at Southend for late and unscheduled flights coming in from Europe to the south east of England.

The Lib-Dem Minister at the Department for Transport has written saying that once the decision was made by Labour not to have a public inquiry the incoming Coalition Government cannot overturn it – although both parties in the Coalition have a policy of no more airport expansion in the south east corner of the country.

So now the fight is being taken forward by the environmental groups and local residents applying to the courts for a judicial review.

David Amess has a petition on his website, which I have signed, in an attempt to get some action from Europe.

We are both fighting the ‘Barmy Bunch’ on Southend Council that ignore the residents. Didn’t someone say something about the ‘Big Society’ and devolving power to the people?

Yes, it is a funny old game, Jimmy.

On Leigh issues I am getting a lot of replies about drinking in a public place and the Leigh Times even published a letter from that prominent BBC personality, Richard Baker who is against any such changes – but I think the young people drinking on the Cliffs now are a very different bunch to the Westcliff High School boys of yesteryear he talks about, when antisocial behaviour and vandalism by large gatherings of youngsters had not been invented.

I have tried to get the law enforced of infringing on the highway – tables and chairs cluttering the pavements which is supposed to be against the law.

In days gone by the law was enforced, and a council officer was there in no time. I can remember having to get a delivery of sand and paving slabs off the highway by nightfall or face prosecution.

The inspector who issued the warning would come back to make sure the highway was clear. You just could not block the pavement.

The council now want to control what is put on the footpath by charging businesses to do so. That’s not enforcement, it is another money making scheme.

I remember this being introduced in Southend High Street and seafront areas – but now it is town-wide or is it?

Yes, you guessed right – it does not apply to Thorpe Bay Broadway where they closed down a shop that dared to sell tea and cakes on the pavement. But Leigh is now designated as part of the night time economy of the town.

But there is no extra money for the police to look after the problems in Leigh and the residents who live in the side roads off the Broadway/Leigh Road, Old Leigh and the London Road.

They have to put up with the noise and worse into the early hours – whereas the letter writer, Richard Baker, forgets that the pubs used to shut at 10pm.

Now, thanks to Tony Blair we are lucky that they shut by 2am and their licence could allow them to open all night as we are deemed part of the night time economy.

Eddie Stobart transport group boosted by Tesco and Irn Bru

Friday, August 20th, 2010

Eddie Stobart group’s performance ahead of last year

Trucking group Stobart, whose Eddie Stobart lorries are a common site on Britain’s motorways, said its business had made a strong start to the year thanks to new multi-million pound contracts with Irn Bru maker AG Barr and Tesco.

The haulier, which is recasting itself as a transport group by offering rail, air and sea freight as well as warehousing services, said its performance in the first six months of the year was in line with management expectations and “significantly ahead” of the same period last year. “We expect continued growth in the second half as new contracts start to deliver, whilst we recognise the economic environment remains challenging,” said its chief executive Andrew Tinkler.

Stobart said volumes at trucks division Eddie Stobart were “strong” thanks to a recent deal – worth about £7m a year – to provide transport and warehousing for Scottish drinks group AG Barr which also makes Tizer. Other notable wins include a £25m-a-year distribution contract with Britain’s biggest supermarket chain Tesco.

The company said volatility in load volumes had been a problem during the period and it was working with its customers to overcome them. Despite this issue Tinkler said overall trading at the division, which operates over 1,850 trucks, was in line with targets and significantly ahead of last year.

Stobart said trading at its rail arm had fallen short of management expectations as a good performance on freight was undermined by weakness at its engineering services business which supplies Network Rail. Uncertainty over future government spending meant orders from the state-owned rail infrastructure company were unchanged from a year ago. Tinkler said the rail division remained an important part of the picture with its expertise relevant to other projects such as an ambitious plan to transform Southend Airport into a hub for cheap passenger flights to take on London City Airport for the Olympic Games in 2012. He said he expected the new railway station and control tower at Southend to be finished this year.

Analysts expect Stobart, which has a market value of £380m, to make a pre-tax profit of £35.2m this year, up from £29.3m last year. Jonathan Jackson, head of equities at Killik & Co, says the company’s decision to use the strong cash flow generated by its core road haulage business to diversify had set it up for future growth. “Stobart is now able to provide an integrated service which addresses a number of clients concerns regarding traffic congestion, pollution and cost,” said Jackson. “Although the economic environment remains challenging, strong growth is expected in the second half as new contracts come through.”

Airport plan leaves listed church intact

Friday, August 20th, 2010

By JOHN GEOGHEGAN

  • Lane to become dead end and church to lose old wall
  • Yew hedge to be grown to hide airport security fence

SOUTHEND Airport has revealed detailed plans for work taking place near a listed church in preparation for the extension of the runway.

About 38m of the late-Victorian wall around the medieval church of St Laurence and All Saints Church will be removed and replaced with a yew hedge, to allow for the expanded airport field.

There will be no changes made to the church itself, though it was feared the Grade I-listed building, parts of which date back to the 12th century, may have to be demolished or moved.

The wall would be rebuilt to the west of the churchyard and the airport will also resurface the 19-space church car park as well as landscape the area around it.

The plans, which must be approved by Southend Council, are part of the much larger application to extend the airport’s runway, which was given the go-ahead by the Government in April [March].

As part of the agreement, a section of Eastwoodbury Lane running alongside the church will be diverted.

Plans show a turning area for cars outside the church, before the road reaches a dead end. A wooden gate will be erected by the mini roundabout.

St Laurence church warden Paul McPherson said: “The planning application will include reorganisation of the road outside the church main entrance. We are aware of it and we don’t object to it.”

Mr McPherson said the church would have the keys to the wooden gate and control who comes in, to allow for wedding cars and hearses to pull up near the church.

The airport field will have a 3m-high security perimeter fence, which will be behind the yew hedge. The council hopes to make a decision by August 24.

‘Airport expansion a big opportunity’

Friday, August 13th, 2010

I HAVE lived in Southend for over 30 years now and I have always believed that the town has tremendous potential.

During that period I also believed that we have suffered from having too many people in the town with a truly parochial mentality.

This is the main reason Southend has never become a major business hub in south Essex.

The situation with the airport expansion is a prime example. Its expansion is an opportunity to bring business, jobs and prosperity to the town and, in my view, should be an opportunity welcomed by all residents.

But no, we have the Stop Airport Expansion [Extension] Now group, which seems set in the dark ages and only concerned with its own narrow interests.

Added to this, we now have the MP for Southend West, David Amess, who seems to be more interested in taking a backward step by trying to get a few extra votes from the above mentioned group than trying to develop a bright and promising future for the town. Together they are wasting public money to revisit an issue that has already been agreed by the councils and a minister.

For goodness sake, let’s all get behind the airport expansion and put Southend firmly back on the map again.

JANICE PRICE
Hobleythick Lane, Westcliff

Against Airport Plans

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

From: Graham Whitehead, director of SAEN

I have just listened to the interview with Denis from SAEN on Radio Essex this morning.

I agree with Denis that the Extension of the runway would allow even larger, heavier jets to use the airport. The noise that these jets make will really affect the houses & schools under the flight path.

With the runway extension, some of these heavy jets, whether passenger, freight or mixed, could be as low as 77 feet above some of the expensive houses in Leigh-on-Sea. Of course, as the airport operates 24 hours, this will be day and night.

They do say they will restrict night flights, but the restrictions only apply to some types of planes and those not covered are still very noisy. I believe that the majority of the current night flights would not be covered by these restrictions.

It is good to hear that David Amess also backs SAEN in their campaign to get the planning permission quashed.

As he said on the radio: “Had there been a different government in power, it is very likely that a public inquiry would have taken place” (not a direct quote, I cannot write that fast). Instead it appears that the Minister’s desk was cleared with understandable haste when the election was announced.

So I am not accused of trying to hide my identity I am one of the directors of SAEN Ltd and an active campaigner against the runway extension.

High Court bid on airport plan

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

SAEN Ltd is aware that an application for permission to apply for a Judicial Review is being lodged with the High Court.

The claimant is a local resident SAEN member highly concerned at the decision by Southend Borough Council to grant planning permission for an extended runway and has the full support of the campaign group.

There is particular concern over the potential impact of night flights and despite assurances to the contrary, they believe that the new mitigation measures are insufficient to avoid widespread distress.

The economic argument for additional jobs has never been substantiated and is uncertain at best. What is certain, however, is that there will be extra noise and pollution for an area already one of the most congested and densely populated in the United Kingdom.

“We had no choice, but to go to court,” said SAEN director, Graham Whitehead. “Both Southend and Rochford councils have shown total disregard for the interests of their residents and this should never have been approved by the Development Control Committee.

“The Council took the decision against he will of the vast majority of the people who responded to the consultation.

“We believe that the planning permission process was legally flawed and we are confident that the Court will find in our favour.”