Archive for September, 2010

“Stopping up” of Eastwoodbury Lane

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

Public Notice

DEPARTMENT FOR
TRANSPORT

TOWN AND COUNTRY
PLANNING ACT 1990

THE SECRETARY OF STATE hereby gives notice that he proposes to make an Order under section 247 of the above Act to authorise the stopping up of a length of Eastwoodbury Lane, Eastwood at Southend-on-Sea in the Borough of Southend-on-Sea.

IF THE ORDER IS MADE, the stopping up will be authorised only in order to enable the development described in the Schedule to this notice to be carried out in accordance with the conditional planning permission granted to London Southend Airport Company Limited by Southend-on-Sea Borough Council on 30 April 2010 under reference 09/01960/FULM.

COPIES OF THE DRAFT ORDER AND RELEVANT PLANS MAY BE INSPECTED at all reasonable hours during 28 days commencing on 30 September 2010 at Southend-on-Sea Borough Council, Civic Centre, Victoria Avenue, Southend-on-Sea, Essex, SS2 6ER and may be obtained free of charge from the Secretary of State at the offices of the Department for Transport (quoting reference NATTRAN/E/S247/132) at the address stated below.

ANY PERSON MAY OBJECT to the making of the proposed order within the period of 28 days commencing on 30 September 2010 by notice to the Secretary of State, quoting the above reference, addressed to the National Transport Casework Team, Government Office for the North East, Citygate, Gallowgate, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4WH.

In preparing an objection it should be borne in mind that the substance of it may be imparted to other persons who may be affected by it and that those persons may wish to communicate with the objector about it.

SANDRA ZAMENZADEH
On behalf of the Department for Transport

THE SCHEDULE

Planning permission is granted to extend runway, divert Eastwoodbury Lane with new cycleway and footpath, re-position play area and re-provide recreational space and associated parking to south east, alter access, parking area and boundary to St Laurence and All Saints Church and various ancillary works in connection with runway extension, including the demolition of 6 dwellings on land and buildings between south west corner of Southend Airport and Eastwoodbury Lane, Eastwood, Southend-on-Sea, Essex.

Government Offices for the Regions.

Airport picks up progress award

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

SOUTHEND Airport has beat off competition to win a prestigious award.

The European Regions Airline Association handed bosses the Airport Achievement Award 2010 for progress made over 12 months.

Judges were impressed with the ‘professional execution’ in the airport’s achievement in getting planning permission for the runway extension without a public enquiry before it is built in 2011. [Essentially, they are being rewarded for successfully subverting the democratic process.]

The airport was also congratulated at the Catalynya Congress Centre, in Barcelona, for ‘seizing the window of opportunity provided by the London 2012 Olympics’. [Southend Airport is not an official Olympics transport provider and there is no indication that they will become one. Furthermore, it is unlikely in the extreme that they would be able to have the runway extension finished in time for the Olympics, which is now less than two years away.]

Alastair WElch, airport managing director, said: “We are delighted to win this award, which is a testament to all the hard work that has been put in by the entire team at Southend Airport in making the plans for our development a reality.

“It’s an exciting time for the airport right now as we are now beginning to see all the developments we have been planning and working towards finally starting to happen.”

International airports had been shortlisted for the recognition which recognises those who play a positive role in intra-European air transport operations.

Southend Airport is expected to be complete in 2012, along with a new railway station and control tower.

Roadworks required to enable the diversion of Eastwoodbury Lane will begin in autumn while planning permission has been granted for a nearby 126-bedroom hotel.

It is hoped more than two million passengers will use the site per year by 2020. [There is no realistic prospect of this though, given that by then the oil price is likely to make flying prohibitively expensive for all but a very limited number of people.]

Council should be ashamed

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

THE shrubbery that borders the fence line to the south of St Laurence Park has been savaged by workmen directed by Southend Borough Council, for reasons known only to themselves.

This can only be described as an act of arboreal vandalism, the destruction of something beautiful and, what of the wildlife and their winter food in the hedgerows?

The fact that the open space of this parkland is left largely overgrown, receiving little or no attention throughout the year, makes one wonder if the ulterior motive of keeping it unkempt and uncared for is to promote the idea of an area of low amenity value, so its value as green belt land is kept deliberately low.

One might ask if this ‘vandalism’ is really necessary in order to maintain the boundary.

What, then, of the footpath that links Eastwoodbury Lane and North Crescent? There has been no attempt to trim, maintain or look after this during the year.

It is also a disgrace and people who wish to use it may well struggle and do. How come this has not been attended to? Is this to give the impression the footpath is not used? Well it is!

Shame on you, Southend Council, if this is how you get around re-designating the green belt for the purpose of driving a road through it.

How can it be called parkland when it resembles waste land?

Mr G E Harvey
North Crescent, Prittlewell

‘Toxic’ Olympics effect may hit UK visitor numbers, warns tourist body

Monday, September 20th, 2010

London may have false expectations, says association, pointing to anticlimax in Beijing, Sydney and Athens

Owen Gibson, sports news correspondent

Aerial view of the London Olympic site

Work continues on the site of the London Olympics, but the European Tour Operators Association warns visitor numbers may be disappointing. Photograph: EPA

The trade body representing tour operators has warned that expectations of a boost in tourism from the London Olympics may not be met, after unveiling research that suggested previous games had a “toxic” effect on visitor numbers.

The European Tour Operators Association, which held a seminar on the subject today, released research that showed previous hosts had invariably overestimated the number of foreign visitors and the duration of their stay.

The Sydney games in 2000 anticipated 132,000 visitors and received 97,000 for the games period, while Athens hoped for 105,000 per night in 2004 and received fewer than 14,000. In 2008, Beijing anticipated more than 400,000 foreign guests and received 235,000 for the whole month of August.

The average number of hotel beds occupied in Beijing during the Olympics was 39% down on the previous year, the ETOA report showed. It said that while the Beijing Games may have been a “triumph of planning and showmanship”, for the tourism industry they were a “toxic event that crushed normal demand, both business and leisure”. The report said that while tourism chiefs and organisers had recognised that the Olympics would create some displacement, with visitors arriving for the games replacing those put off by the fact it was taking place, they still tended to talk in terms of a large overall boost.

“For London many in the industry are anticipating a boom, with up to 350,000 foreign visitors predicted per day during the Olympics,” it said. “This expectation of bounty creates its own problems. In London, hoteliers expect to be full with premium business, and some anticipate a displacement of demand that fills up the surrounding months.”

Lord Coe, chairman of the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games, has talked of 1 million “extra” visitors coming to the UK for the games.

But the ETOA report claimed that the perception that the host city would be crowded and prices expensive was likely to tarnish the view of the country as a whole.

It said its members were already dealing with the perception that the UK would be crowded and so best avoided in 2012.

“The problem is not restricted to the host city. London is the gateway to the UK and its biggest draw. If you remove London from a visit to the British Isles, everywhere else becomes far more difficult to sell,” it said. “Athens has nothing like the central importance that London occupies, yet when its visitor arrivals dropped by 6% in the Olympic year, regional Greece fell by 11%.”

Olympic organisers and the mayor of London, Boris Johnson, face an ongoing battle to convince overseas travellers that visiting London for the games will remain cost-efficient and have appealed to hotels not to try and cash in by increasing their prices.

They would also argue that a narrow analysis of the number of people visiting during Games-time ignores its longer term benefits in terms of acting as a giant global marketing event for London and the UK and changing the perceptions of those who might not otherwise visit the country.

“Precisely because London is one of the top international destinations, it has more to lose. At the moment a false expectation of bookings is in danger of destroying an export industry,” said the ETOA executive director, Tom Jenkins. “For August 2012, ETOA members – who alone regularly deliver over 15,000 hotel rooms per day – cannot reserve space. Without any reservations to sell, nothing can be sold.”

A spokesman for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport said: “This is a weary old story. No one seriously believes that any tourist accommodation will remain unfilled during the Games themselves. The important point is that the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games are a long-term investment in the future of Britain’s visitor economy and a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to enhance the image of the UK as a visitor destination.”

He added: “VisitBritain’s marketing strategy and the creation of the new £1bn marketing and PR fund will be used to reassure the world that Britain is open for business throughout 2012. And showing the best that Britain has to offer while the spotlight of the world is upon us will create a tourism legacy for years to come.”

Jenkins said that if politicians and tourism chiefs recognised the issues, they could plan to overcome them.

“Even during the peak moments the numbers attending the games themselves are unlikely to exceed those who attend games across the city during the football season. And these numbers are dwarfed by the millions of commuters that regularly use its infrastructure,” he added “If this applies to the 17 days of an Olympics, then the message for the remaining 50 weeks is that London will be open, like no other city, for normal business. It is with this message that London must welcome the world.”

Council is shortsighted over airport

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

THE shortsighted council disregards public opinion it sought in the JAAP report.

This insensitive council is now to evict six families to make way for a strip of concrete to ensure the airport (beast) grows and becomes more threatening.

Happier days will be those we will look back on when the airport (beast) was dormant, under control and slept at night like we need to!

Soon we won’t be able (allowed) to sleep. Soon the roads around the airport will become gridlocked because the single runway totally bi-sects the airfield forcing communications between the present operating area in the South East corner [of the country] and the proposd expansion ares in the North West to be carried on existing roads.

The above observation excludes arriving and departing traffic on existing roads.

The above also excludes freight (cargo) traffic i.e. lorries operating at night because the existing roads are quieter then.

Is our town prepared for this beast? Do we want this beast so close? Let’s thank the Lord there are no trees at the airport for the short-sighted council to get excited over.

B J Cole
Gayton Road, Southend

Airport Questions

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

From: John Beckett, Woodcutters Avenue, Leigh

I fully agree with Peter Wexham in his recent article that Southend Council did not listen to residents’ concerns on the expansion of Southend Airport and its runway extension.

It is still very unclear what sort of planes will come under the restrictions, agreed by the council and Stobart Group, especially for night flights.

Also, with so many holiday companies going bust, with passengers left in the lurch abroad, how many holiday companies will risk coming to Southend Airport only to lose money and go bust themselves.

I really think Southend Council were conned into signing up with the Stobart Group*, and I don’t think they realise how it will affect the lives of so many people, especially in the Leigh and Belfairs area.

I have also read that freight aircraft flights have greatly increased at Stansted Airport – so it is obvious that the Stobart Group, being a freight company, will also see Southend Airport as a large freight area to exploit.

I hate to think of what could happen in the future to the nice area we live in Leigh and Belfairs with large freight aircraft overhead.


* Note from SAEN: The council actually left themselves with no choice about who would buy the airport lease due to the gross negligence they displayed when selling the lease to RAL in 1994 for one pound. While the lease itself was not allowed to be sold without the Council’s approval, it had been sold not directly to Regional Airports Limited (RAL), but to the London Southend Airport Company (LSAC) which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of RAL. This meant that when RAL wanted to dispose of the airport, they merely had to sell LSAC to someone else. On paper, therefore, the owner has not changed and RAL waltzed off with the full sale price which morally should have come back to the council. Coincidentally(?), the total sale price was almost exactly the same as the amount of taxpayers’ money the Council has ploughed into the airport since the 1980s.

EasyJet ‘unlikely’ to fly into Southend

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

BUDGET airline EasyJet is “unlikely” to fly from Southend Airport when it expands, says an employee.

EasyJet’s David McLaren made the statement on the company’s official customer feedback website, Get Satisfaction.

He was responding to a suggestion posted by a customer that the airline should consider operating services to fly to Berlin. In the statement, Mr McLaren says: “As EasyJet already service three London airports, which are more centrally located than Southend Airport, it is unlikely that we will fly to and from this airport once the modernisation is finished.

“Also, EasyJet does already fly from Berlin to both London Gatwick and London Luton a number of times daily.”

Campaigners Stop Airport Extension Now, which is against the runway’s extension, said the comment supports its argument that Southend is too “inaccessible” and close to homes to become a passenger airport.

Spokesman Denis Walker said: “Evidence that Southend will be unable to attract passenger operators has been mounting for some time.”

But airport bosses said they are holding “constructive talks with a number of airlines” though they could not reveal who.

An airport spokesman added: “The airport’s main focus is still attracting passenger airlines to the airport.”