Archive for April, 2010

Full council will vote on night flights cap

Friday, April 30th, 2010

Plans to restrict night flights at Southend Airport will be considered by Southend’s full council.

Southend Council’s Lib Dem group proposed to change the lease of the airport so there would be no flights for a specific period each night. An all-party council committee has now agreed all members should consider banning flying for a specific period each night.

Lib Dem leader Graham Longley said possible closures could be between 1am and 4am or from 2am to 5am.

He said: “We made the point the airport decision is made, and we now have to mitigate the effects where they will be unfriendly to residents. Night closure for a period of time would give the residents an assurance that they would get at least a period of undisturbed sleep.”

The extension of the airprot runway has been agreed, but details of the lease, including the runway extension and arrangements for night flights, also have to be agreed by Southend Council.

Tory leader Nigel Holdcroft said he wanted the whole council to decide on the lease arrangements to reassure the public. He said: “Assuming I’m still leader, the cabinet would make a decision on the airport lease and then refer it to full council, to participate in the debate and then vote.

“Hopefully it will reassure members of the public who’ve been concerned about the planning process. It will be a choice of do we allow the runway extension and the environmental controls, or not allow the extension and continue without controls?

“Without wishing to pre-empt any decision, from my discussions with the airport it says if we try to impose a night-time ban, the airport will become inoperable because of business plans and their arrangements with the contractors.”

Election slurs: police inquiry

Friday, April 30th, 2010

Did airport protest letter break polling law?

ANTI-AIRPORT protesters are facing a police inquiry into alleged election law breaches.

An anonymous letter containing inaccurate and damaging claims about individual council candidates was posted through hundreds of doors in Southend and Leigh.

It was attached to a leaflet from Stop Airport Expansion [Extension] Now, but the protest group denies responsibility.

Southend Council leader Nigel Holdcroft said: “They are not only breaking electoral law, but the facts contained in these leaflets are nothing more than scaremongering.”

Cops investigate alleged breach of election law

Anti-airport protesters accused of sending out damning letters about council candidates

A POLICE investigation will be launched into a possible breach of election law by airport protesters.

An anonymous letter containing damaging allegations about a number of council candidates was sent to homes in Leigh and Southend.

The letter was attached to elaflets for protest group Stop Airport Expansion [Extension] Now, but the group has denied responsibility.

The letters make inaccurate allegations about individual councillors over the decision to allow the airport expansion.

They also breach strict election laws because they target specific candidates, have no legally-required imprint stating who has written them, and do not represent declared election expenses.

Council leader Nigel Holdcroft called the letter misleading and prejudiced against the Conservative party.

He said: “The leaflets appear to represent a concerted campaign to discourage support for some candidates based on misleading information. They are not only breaking electoral law, but the ‘facts’ contained in these leaflets are nothing more than scaremongering designed to influence people’s votes.”

Denis Walker, a spokesman for Stop Airport Expansion [Extension] Now, said the group was not involved.

He said: “If someone else is delivering our leaflets with their own paperwork attached, it’s not something we have asked them to do or would support them doing.

“We are very much aware of electoral law.”

Southend Council has confirmed it has received a complaint about an alleged breach of electoral law. The police have confirmed they have taken up the investigation.

What’s Electoral Law?

  • It is illegal to make or publish a false statement or fact about the personal character or conduct of an election candidate with the purpose of affecting how many votes they get.
  • It must be a distinct statement of fact as opposed to an expression of opinion or comment about a candidate.
  • If the false statement is defamatory, the person who publishes it can also face a libel action.
  • All election publications must carry details of the full name and postal address of the printer and promoter of the material.

SAEN not responsible for “leafletgate”

Friday, April 30th, 2010

Nigel Holdcroft’s assertion that SAEN has been responsible for “illegal” election leaflets is a disgraceful slur and a desperate attempt by a failed councillor to deflect public anger away from himself. SAEN absolutely denies any wrongdoing – the leaflet published on the CouncilBust.com website this morning was not written or distributed by SAEN.

Holdcroft is the leader of a council which has ridden roughshod over the people of this town in so many areas. Whether it’s airport expansion, road widening or tree-felling, public opinion has invariably been overwhelmingly against the council’s policies and this coming Thursday will be the day that the people of Southend have the opportunity to pass judgement on him and his council.

Holdcroft made the decision to side with big business against the electorate’s wishes so he can hardly complain if they sling him out. That’s democracy and he clearly doesn’t like it.

ENDS.

Notes to Editors

“Stop Airport Extension Now” (SAEN) was formed to campaign against the runway extension at Southend Airport. The group is not opposed to the Airport itself, which has co-existed with the residents of Southend for many years. SAEN is against the runway extension, which would lead to a massive increase in flights and destroy the lives of the people living, working or going to school anywhere near the flightpath.

For further information:

  • Contact Denis Walker, Press Officer SAEN (Stop Airport Extension Now)
  • Visit the SAEN website – http://saen.org.uk/

Airport protesters vow not to give up

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

AN anti-airport expansion group is digging in its heels after a Southend Council election candidate called for it to disband.

David Garston, Tory candidate for St Laurence ward, accused the Stop Airport Extension Now group of trying to “terrify” residents about the effects of the extending Southend airport’s runway.

However, the group insists it has no intention of disbanding. It is now raising funds for a legal challenge to the airport expansion, after a Government inspector backed the plan.

George Harvey, chairman of the group, said: “We are campaigning at the moment to swell the funds and are in the midst of doing a leaflet drop in the area around and under the flight path.

“We are just heightening awareness of what this could mean to people. If they are prepared to say they don’t mind it, that is fine, but we are not terrifying people. People make their own decisions.”

Mr Garston claims the development of the airport is a done deal and will bring great benefits to the town.

He suggested Stop Airport Expansion [Extension] Now should disband, so everyone could focus on the future.

He added: “This unelected minority group’s inability to accept the issue is over defies all logic. The fact it is continuing to try to terrify Southend residents by spreading fabrication and exaggeration about this development, and attempting to make the airport development a political issue, is both reprehensible and unhelpful.”

In defence of the group’s stance, Mr Harvey said the group had not sought to make its continuing campaign political in any way.

He said: “The fact is David Garston has made it a political item. We didn’t ask him to do that. I don’t want to get into a political round of fisticuffs, because that is not our aim.

“We believe the expansion will cause more harm than good. That’s our view, and the view of many, many people.”

Airport views are wrong

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

If Miss K Baxter is so concerned about developments at Southend Airport, why has it taken so long for her to wield the mighty pen in defence of Leigh?

Miss Baxter seems to have added nothing new to the debate and churns out hte same old last week to write a letter of complaint to the press.

I don’t know how old Miss K Baxter is, but if she had been old enough to remember the Hurricanes, Spitfires and Blenhein bombers ‘crashing in and out of the airfield from dawn to dusk’ in defence of Essex, I don’t think she would have considered complaining then.

If Miss Baxter wanted to be taken seriously she should have avoided using such overdramatic language in her letter.

At best, Southend could only be considered as a regional airport; and even then with the short runway extension, only relatively small passenger aircraft – and not necessarily jets – will be able to land there. This would never be another Stanstead.

How about this one:- “the air fills with fumes”.

Miss Baxter, do you know how many road vehicles pass through the streets of Leigh every day belching fumes?

Or this:- “Putting our children, friends and neighbours’ lives at risk”:

Miss Baxter, when was the last resident of Leigh killed on the ground as a result of commercial aircraft using Southend Airport?

Don’t bother to look it up; it was on May 3, 1967 – 43 years ago – not a bad record you must agree – now ask yourself how many people have been killed on the roads of Leigh in the same period?

Southend Airport needs to be utilised more to survive. If this does not happen, it would be an ideal spot to build a large housing estate and think of the disruption to Leigh’s ‘quaint charm and tranquility’ this would case – more roads, more cars, more congestion, crowded schools and hospitals – need I go on?

Finally, Miss Baxter, the airfield has been in operation since 1914 and there are probably few people now living in Leigh who were there before the airfield was built.

One question no protester ever seems to be able to answer is: If residents were aware of the airfield and that they would be under or near a flight path if they moved to Leigh, why did they move there?

Brian Fry, Sparrows Herne,
Basildon

Eruption is a message

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

APART from giving huge numbers of people a peaceful weekend, the volcanic eruption in Iceland showed that there are other ways to travel.

Coaches, ships and trains, if properly organised, are able to cater for most European destinations without the need to fly.

Perhaps we are all being given a message.

David Barratt
Southbourne Grove, Westcliff

Stobart has brainwashed our council

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

AFTER brainwashing our council into allowing a 300-metre extension to the runway at the cynically renamed ‘London’ Southend Airport, we are now presented in the Yellow Advertiser with the plans by airport manager Andrew [Alastair] Welch and Stobart’s to build a massive airport terminal resembling the Death Star to all residents of Leigh-on-Sea and Rochford.

I am not a politician and have never sought to be, however I find it absolutely astonishing that a company like Stobarts with no connection, history or links to the area whatsoever can come here and start to fly jets.

These will carry their freight mainly from 6.30am to 11pm every 15 minutes over this densely populated area comprising a largely elderly and retired and in many respects, disabled community, without a concern for the noise (which will be horrendous!), the pollution that will be astronomical and the safety!

They will be in total breach of our Human Right to a quiet life.

I, then, am totally dumbfounded, shocked and disgusted that the local council, who are supposed to represent their electorate, who are mainly all against it, find this all quite ‘acceptable’ and vote in favour of the planning application on the promise of a few jobs for the area.

I mean, if I start a lawnmower in my back garden on a Sunday morning at 6.30am (let alone a jet engine), I am sure all the neighbours would complain and I would be told to stop immediately by the council (and rightly so).

However, jets flying at low levels overhead carrying Stobart’s freight every 15 minutes, that is acceptable!

The noise alone must be above certain guidelines and bylaws that the council has obviously chosen to ignore.

As I said before, I am pretty certain that a large amount of the population affected will have absolutely no idea what is coming their way. The public needs to be informed.

The other classic argument is that this airport must be ready for the Olympics and Paralympics 2012.

How low can Andrew [Alastair] ‘Whisper Jet’ Welch go that he finds it acceptable to use the heroes of our Paralympic team to ‘justify’ him flying low level jets spewing noise and air pollution over the area to line his and his Stobarts buddies pockets?

Aren’t the Olympics in Stratford? And how is Stobart’s flying its freight at 6.30am on a Sunday morning over the heads of sleeping retired folk going to help the Olympics and Paralympics? What about the disabled folk trying to rest or sleep under the flight path?

Our own Olympian from Leigh-on-Sea, Mark Foster, would surely not want to be anywhere near this airport during his training as he would need total peace and quiet during the night as part of his training and recovery.

The only connection I can see with the Olympics is the speed at which this has been rushed through. That is surely worthy of an Olympic record alone (anything that quick would surely be the subject of a drug test after the event).

And finally, there were reports that Stobart was building a new control tower at the airport. Why bother?

It appears Stobart can control Southend Council without the need for a new control tower or are you going to rename them ‘Stobart’s Southend Council’ like the airport?

Mr T Knightley
Address supplied

No SERT route for airport

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

Echo story: “Plans finally ready for south Essex super bus funding bid”

A visionary plan for a fleet of super buses to speed up public transport in south Essex is a step closer to being realised.

Following a year of consultations and design tweaks, councils are submitting detailed plans to the Government for the £56.3million South Essex Rapid Transport scheme, known as Sert.

The project aims to see modern, comfortable buses cruise along two routes – the first between Basildon and Lakeside, and the second from Southend seafront to Progress Road industrial estate.

The buses would run seven days a week, from 6am until midnight, and every 15 minutes, during peak times.

They will be fitted with GPS systems that will trigger traffic lights to change to green as they approach to speed up journeys. Additional bus lanes will also be built where possible.

Essex County Council is set to rubber stamp the scheme later this month before it goes to the Department of Transport for approval. If all goes well, work could start in May 2012.

Southend Council is backing the project. Anna Waite, Southend councillor responsible for transport, said: “Everyone knows there is a major issue with congestion in south Essex.

“We have to think of ways to get people out of their cars and on to public transport.

“I think a fast, efficient and consistent bus network is the way to do that.”

Following a public consultation last year, planners dropped two routes – the first between Southend Airport and Shoebury railway station, and the second joining Laindon to Pitsea railway station – due to costs.

However, those and other routes joining Rayleigh, Rochford, Billericay, Wickford and other towns are planned for the future.

It is also hoped the project will join up with a new bus scheme on the A13, from Leigh to Basildon via Benfleet.

In the long term, it is hoped the system could link up with London’s Oyster card services.

Mrs Waite added: “When you drive along the A13 in the morning and see all that traffic queuing to get into Dagenham and the City, you think this is madness.”

“It makes sense to get some of those drivers on to public transport.”

Stobart’s bid for airline of its own

Friday, April 16th, 2010

PLANES branded with the Stobart logo could soon be flying from Southend into Europe, bosses have said.

Airline operators are queuing up to fly out of the airport, Eddie Stobart chief executive Andrew Tinkler says.

Stobart, which owns the airport, is already a famous brand with fans all over the country looking out for the green lorries. To raise the marketing stakes even higher, its name could be emblazoned on planes.

Mr Tinkler said since the approval of the runway extension, scores of airlines were interested in flying from Southend to southern Europe. There was also interest in running a shuttle service to Stobart’s other airport in Carlisle to serve the North.

He said: “With the railway station coming along, we will soon have a train link into London. Once we have that things will really begin to happen. We have the new control tower being built and with all this we could have an operator in place soon.

“We don’t need the extension for that to happen, the operator can plan for when the extension is built and exactly where to fly. We want to be able to deliver everything before the Olympics in 2012.”

He admitted the airport could easily take more than one airline operator, and speculation has been that a popular budget company like easyJet or Ryanair could be among them.

Mr Tinkler said: “We’re in talks with operators about it and have a lot of interest from all areas and a number of cheaper operators, too, including European operators.

“Ideally somewhere along the line there will be cheap flights out of there. It’s too early to say who, there are too many interested.”

The approval of the runway extension last month has pushed forward the long-held ambition to expand the airport and provide flights for up to two million passengers a year by 2020.

A 300-metre extension of the runway is one of the key parts of the £35million development of the airport, which Stobart bought in December 2008.

Mr Tinkler added: “Eighty-five per cent of freight is usually carried on a passener plane. By putting freight under the seats we can offer that service and help operators fill freight space. It’s better coming under seats than separate planes.”

Stobart, which transports road, rail, sea and air freight, aims to open the runway and terminal in 2011 and the £12million station, on the London Liverpool Street line, this summer.

How not to vote

Saturday, April 10th, 2010

We want to provide information that helps you decide who to vote for, not decide for you. On this page, we tell you who not to vote for based on the assumption that SAEN supporters would not want to vote for someone who supports the runway extension and expansion of Southend Airport.

Details of the elections including the Statements as to Persons Nominated are available on the Southend Borough Council website and the Rochford District Council website.

See TheyWorkForYou.com for the results of the nationwide survey they conducted. The candidates’ responses to the question on Southend Airport included in the local sections for the two constituencies are included below. To date, only Terry Phillips, Barry Bolton, Tom Flynn, Kevin Bonavia, James Moyies and Geoff Strobridge have responded.

Tory Central Office has apparently issued a cut-and-paste statement rejecting the survey for their candidates to use, saying that it can’t “capture the nuances of party policies”.

We leave you to form your own opinions of candidates who can’t be bothered to answer their electors’ questions.

General Election

Southend West

  • David Anthony Andrew Amess – Conservative
    Wanted Public Inquiry into runway extension; wants safeguards for residents. Has not mentioned the airport in his election leaflet.
  • Peter Welch – Liberal Democrat
    Opposes runway extension
  • Tom Flynn – Labour
    Supports runway extension and says in TheyWorkForYou survey: “I have publicly supported expansion in order to boost the Southend economy – but only if there are no night flights and the necessary improvements to infrastructure (roads etc) are undertaken”
  • Barry George Bolton – Green Party
    Opposes all airport expansion. In the TheyWorkForYou survey, he says: “This plan will blight homes in Southend and bring little benefit. More planes from bigger airports is not a good way to manage air travel and its many problems”
  • Dr Vel – Independent
    Unknown
  • Garry Lee Cockrill – UKIP
    Unknown
  • Tony Gladwin – BNP
    Unknown
  • Terry Phillips – English Democrats
    Supports runway extension and says in TheyWorkForYou survey: “I believe that the airport will bring industry to southend. My only concern is the NIGHT flights. This will need the same restrictions as in place at london city airport. then it will work”

Rochford & Southend East

  • James Duddridge – Conservative
    Supports runway extension, describing it as “a golden opportunity for Rochford and Southend”. Says “he will continue to fight hard for the urgent completion of the project”.
  • Graham Edwin Longley – Liberal Democrat
    Wanted more scrutiny of decision but supports runway extension
  • Kevin Andrew Martin Bonavia – Labour
    Supports runway extension. Labour haven’t even mentioned the airport on their election leaflets! * In response to the TheyWorkForYou survey, he says “Southend Aiport’s development will help bring more jobs and indirectly support local businesses. But there should be no night flights as per other airports its size.”
  • Andrew John Vaughan – Green Party
    Opposes all airport expansion
  • Anthony Brian Chytry – Independent
    Called for referendum on airport; hasn’t made his own views known
  • James William Moyies – UKIP
    Supports the runway extension.
  • Geoff Strobridge – BNP
    Claims neutrality and says – this is a direct quote from his survey response for TheyWorkForYou – “The decision has already been made, so we are buggerd! We got to do the best we can, because it’s going to happen.”

Local Election

The official Statement of Persons Nominated is available on the Southend Borough Council website. Further details of the local elections will be available on this page shortly.

Development Control Committee

Below is shown the way members of the DCC voted in January. Names in italics are those councillors who are up for re-election.

Voted for runway extension:

  • Brian KellyConservative
  • Daphne White – Conservative
  • Elizabeth Day – Conservative
  • Ann Robertson – Conservative
  • Gwen Horrigan – Conservative
  • Richard Brown – Conservative
  • Jonathan Garston – Conservative
  • Roger HadleyConservative
  • Stephen Habermel – Conservative
  • Ron Woodley – Independent
  • Mike Assenheim – Independent
  • Mike RoystonLabour
  • David Norman – Labour
  • Ted LewinLiberal Democrat

Voted against runway extension:

  • Barry GodwinLiberal Democrat
  • Jim Clinkscales – Liberal Democrat
  • Mike GrimwadeLiberal Democrat

The conclusion to be drawn from this is that you can’t vote Conservative, Labour or for Ted Lewin in the local elections.

On the subject of Mr Lewin, a local resident has been in touch to share his door-to-door canvassing patter:

We had a very interesting conversation with Ted Lewin last night on our doorstep. We told him how disappointed and let down we were that he had voted yes to the airport expansion at the planning meeting. Ted’s answer was it’s better than having a Gypsy site or a Camp for Illegal Immigrants there, which he implied were the other options open to us if the airport didn’t go ahead!

As the airport has a 150-year lease as an airport, it seems unlikely that it will become a Gypsy site or camp for illegal immigrants any time before the year 2144.


If there are any errors in the above, electoral candidates are welcome to contact election@saen.org.uk with corrections. Anyone with a copy of election literature that spells out a candidate’s position on the airport, please scan it and send it to the same address.