Archive for January, 2010

Errors in Planning Dept’s handling of the planning application

Monday, January 11th, 2010

The following is an edited version of a letter sent to Dean Hermitage of Southend Borough Council Planning Department and Andrew Edwards, a member of the GO East Planning Casework Team. Names of respondents have been removed for publication on the web.

Having viewed the Planning Application comments files this morning we would like to draw a number of worrying errors to your attention. There may well be others that we have not spotted as we didn’t have time to review every single letter. However, we believe that the errors we have found raise serious concerns about the way this planning application has been handled by your department and that the figures you have given for the number of objections and letters of support may well be inaccurate.

In the opinion of the SAEN committee, the issues detailed below seriously call into question Southend Council’s competence in handling this case and we most strongly urge the Government Office for the East of England to call this application in to enable proper scrutiny at a Public Inquiry.

1. The “Null Response” file

We asked for clarification on what “Null Response” means and were told that you had said that it was where a letter didn’t contain a full name and address. The file labelled “Null Response” apparently contained only letters of objection, some of which, granted, did not have an address given, but most of which *did* have a full name and address. The very first letter in that file had a full name and address, so it is difficult to see how this mistake could have been made.

Please explain why this file was labelled as “Null Response” when that is not what it contained.

2. The “No Objection” files

The files we were presented with had post-it notes attached to them which read either “Objection”, “No Objection” or “Null Response”. However, the figures you have given us break the responses down into “Objections”, “Supporting”, “No objections” and “Neutral”. Can you please explain how you decided which category a response fell into where it was not specifically marked as a letter of objection or support and why “Supporting” and “No objections” are mixed in the filing?

3. Null Responses in the “No Objection” files

We found a great many cases where people supporting or “not objecting” to the application did not supply a complete address but their letters were filed in the “No Objection” folders.

[9 names cited]

Why were these not filed in the “Null Response” folder and how can we be sure that they were not counted towards the “No Objection” or “Supporting” totals?

4. Objections filed as Support

We have found a number of specific examples where letters of objection have been filed as letters of support.

[6 names cited]

Some of these started by saying such things as “I support Southend Airport, but I do not support the extension of the runway.” These can therefore only be counted as objections to the planning application, which is specifically concerned with the extension of the runway. I recall Barbara Clark’s letter, which was handwritten, said “LETTER OF OBJECTION” at the top. Why were they filed as letters of support?

5. Double counting

We saw several examples of email messages in the “No Objection” file that had been printed twice and were in different parts of the file. It was obvious that they were the same message as they had the same time stamp and were identical.

[2 names cited]

How do we know that these have not been counted twice? Why were systems not put in place to ensure that duplication of this nature was not possible?

6. Comments from outside the area

I distinctly recall that when handling comments on the Priory Crescent scheme, the Council divided them up into comments from Southend residents and those outside the borough. Has this been done with the comments on this planning application? If so, please supply these figures. If not, why not? It was obvious from looking through the files that a large proportion of the comments of support came from outside the area, with conspicuously large contributions from Warrington and Cumbria. While some letters of objection came from outside the area, it was clearly a smaller proportion.

Given that the Development Control Committee meets on Wednesday next week, you will appreciate that a prompt response is required.

Airport vote will be undemocratic

Monday, January 11th, 2010

Mike Grimwade (Dec 29), has objected to my “brainwashing”

comments and asserts that “it would be better to base my opinions on facts rather than ignorance”.

Far from ignorance, I have been involved in quite a few projects that have involved the planning process.

I have also followed many others over the years, where often valid objection by residents and opposition councillors have been contemptuously ignored, often for partisan political reasons and using the “consultation”

process as justification.

I have always regarded “consultations” with a considerable degree of cynicism and that they should be seen more as “con” and “insulting”!

With this in mind and the way I had seen matters develop over the airport proposals, my letter was about democracy, little seen in these parts these days.

Indeed Mr Grimwade’s comments just reaffirm my point.

It would seem Mr Grimwade has deliberately chosen to ignore the undemocratic issue that only 17 of an elected 51 councillors will be allowed to vote on a major issue that will affect everyone in the town, not just those in the immediate flightpath area.

We are not talking about minor house alterations or the odd block of flats that will affect a small proportion of the electorate, where one could perhaps justify the committee approach, but a major development that will have repercussions for around 120,000-plus people.

I have yet to see a coherent justification for denying all of this town’s “democratically elected representatives” from voting on such an important issue.

If my concerns justify being called “ignorant”

then I find that just as objectionable as Mr Grimwade did to “stooge”, but then my comments were not personal, but group descriptive!

Mike Hansford
Blenheim Chase
Leigh

…What Mike Grimwade (Jan 4) fails to take into consideration is that the data submitted with the planning application has been compiled by Southend Airport and its contractors.

It is full of manipulation and dubious claims, for example, that the Government supports the level of expansion proposed.

Denis Walker
East Street
Southend

Road access is the big issue for our airport

Monday, January 11th, 2010

I am sure we are all pleased to hear from Southend Airport director Alistair Welch the vast majority of local residents are all for the expansion of the airport!

Really? He goes on to say how we only need to look at Southampton and Blackpool to see how such expansion of their airports has been great for the towns.

However, one major factor is omitted – that old issue of access, or the more boring word of infrastructure.

Southampton Airport has the M27 going past the end of the runway and is under one minute from the M3, giving fast, efficient access.

At Blackpool, aircraft approach the runway over water, it is under nine minutes to the M55, which in turn links to the M6. That nine-minute journey is via a superior A5230.

Access to Southend Airport is via the A1159 (Manners Way to locals) with its greatly improved Cuckoo Corner! Or you could, of course, take Rochford Road as a scenic alternative.

Then there is the A127, a sub-rate A road linking to the M25 in, let’s say, 35 minutes on a good day, but I am not sure when we last had one of those on the A127.

I am sure that in a couple of weeks the leaders of this town will be pleased to make their decision on the airport, which for the more cynical of us, think they have already shared with Mr Welch.

Why else would his company waste millions of pounds on a railway station and a control tower if it was unsure of a decision?

Oh, and let us not forget that railway. I am sure it will only be a matter of time before Stobart Group applies to have a siding off the main line to give access to a freight depot at the airport.

You doubt? Let’s just wait and see!

Finally, a word of caution to our leaders. If they think they will be able to control this new-found bed partner once they have given it the green light, they should think again!

The company is much bigger than them.

Colin Law
Thornhill
Leigh

…Tony Halls (Jan 1) missed the point of my previous letter on Southend Airport. The point was that I am not a “stooge”, as another correspondent claimed.

If I wish to have a vote on the planning decision on the airport extension, then I am precluded from saying which way I will vote.

Mr Halls assumes he knows what the majority of my voters think. He is not privy to my mail box. He also does not know where the largest section of my ward lies.

I am prepared to tell my residents as to how I voted and why. They will know this before the election so can make their own decision on my actions.

This I consider to be “standing up and being counted”, not spineless.

Mike Grimwade
Lib Dem, Prittlewell Ward
Eastwood Old Road
Leigh

The eleventh hour

Friday, January 8th, 2010

Hello Everyone!

Two important things to tell you today; the first is that the Developmental Control Committee meeting is on the 20th January, and not the date that you may have seen in the Yellow Advertiser. This is the meeting at which the Planning Application will be discussed. It is at 2pm and is open to the public. I think it is important that you try to get there, although I appreciate that some of you may be at work. If your office is closed because of weather, please consider wrapping up as warm as you can and making the effort. If you can’t go yourself, ask your friends and neighbours or family to turn out in your place. This decision will affect them as much as at it will you, after all!

The second thing is the attachment with this e-mail; it is a reminder of the fact that you should all have written to John Denham to demand that this whole process is called in. The only fair way to get the process decided is for a Public Inquiry to take place, in public so that all may state their case openly. There would seem to be a strong feeling amongst many that the whole thing is a done deal, and if that suspicion is there it would surely be better if the Council, the Managing Director of the airport and your SAEN representatives could discuss the whole situation in the light of day, with the public able to judge for themselves. There is still time to write. Please do it if you haven’t already, write to David Amess, write to GO-EAST. Sorry to keep banging on, but this is vitally important!
Check the SAEN website for addresses you will need, and when you’ve finished all that, have a happy new year from kiti and the committee!

See you all on the 20th at the Southend Civic Centre!

Work to begin on airport control tower

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

BUILDING work will start on a new £3million control tower at Southend Airport this month.

It will replace the site’s existing tower, which was built in the 1960s and appeared in a scene in James Bond film ‘Goldfinger’ in 1964.

Essex-based firm Readie Construction has been given the contract to carry out the work, while avionic installation and commissioning will be carried out by Systems Interface Ltd.

Alastair Welch, managing director of Southend Airport, explained that the current tower gave restricted views across the airfield but could not confirm whether it would be demolished.

Mr Welch said: “I’m especially delighted that its construction will be carried out by an essentially, local firm. [By which he means a company based in Romford - hardly that local.]

“This goes to prove that the airport development will create local jobs and play a major part in helping to regenerate the area. [If you think that short-term building contracts going to companies outside the area will regenerate the area.]

“We haven’t made a decision about the current tower but it will not be used. The new tower will allow us to have a full view of the airport.”

The construction of the control tower will begin at the end of this month, while work on the new £12million railway station is already underway.

The station is due to open in mid-2010 and will provide a regular service into London Liverpool Street Station.

Southend Council is also making a decision to extend the airport’s runway at the Development Control Committee on Thursday, January 14.

Airport will not benefit town

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

The Southend Airport controversy is looking more and more like a conspiracy.

A Midlands airport has just closed down after a national airline cancelled its flight schedules and withdrew its planes. Where are the airline companies waiting for Southend Airport to become operational?

If Eddie Stobart really intended a passenger service there would be no necessity for longer runways.

The town will not benefit from airport expansion.

Lorry drivers will doss in the airport Travelodge style hotel. Outgoing passengers will not pop into Southend before they fly off and incoming passengers will go straight to the new railway station.

Len Lierens
Southchurch Road
Southend

Stitch up over airport vote

Monday, January 4th, 2010

Rochford’s [Southend's1] Tory councillors must think they are the bees knees.

Not only do they feel not able reveal the results of the so-called ballot asking residents what they wanted in relation to the extension of Southend Airport, but they also say only Tory members of the council can vote on the issue. What a stitch up that is!

I only hope someone who truly represents us will have the guts to stand up and insist voters have the right to a legal voice against airport takeover of our rights as individuals and still expect our undying support.

No one except its supporters, the minority, wants this monstrosity.

B R Rudlin
Richmond Drive
Rayleigh

1. It is Southend and not Rochford Council that is making the decision on this planning application.

I’ll not be brainwashed over airport decision

Monday, January 4th, 2010

I object to being called a “stooge” by Mike Hansford (Dec 18).

I am one of the 17 members of Southend Council’s development control committee who will make a decision on the airport.

My decision will be made on the planning application and the data submitted with it. I will consider this alongside the various planning control policies and guidance documents that Southend Council has.

I will, of course, take into consideration the many emails, letters and phone calls that I have received from both objectors and supporters of this application.

My answer to these people has been the same – I have noted their views, but am unable to comment as to my own persuasion.

The training I have received over the years is from external agencies as well as internal.

There is no brainwashing.

I will make my own decision based on facts.

It is a pity that, although Mr Hansford is entitled to his opinion, it would be better to be based on facts, not ignorance.

Mike Grimwade
Councillor, Prittlewell Ward
Eastwood Old Road

High price of airport growth

Monday, January 4th, 2010

I strongly object to further development at Southend Airport.

It will add to road congestion, increase noise and air pollution, seriously impact on the lives of people under or close to the flightpath, and have a significant impact on property prices.

There will be increased costs for council taxpayers to pay compensation to homeowners, increased harmful emissions and increased council taxcharges to provide improved infrastructure to airport users.

All I can see is another prime example of poor, negligent service to residents from out-of-touch councillors in Rochford and Southend who appear to hold unrepresentative and questionable views on the type of development that can be acceptable, while failing to protect and guarantee an environment that is necessary to provide an acceptable quality of life.

Given the groundswell of opinion against development generated by the Mayor of London’s office and councils faced with applications for expanding Stansted, Heathrow and Gatwick, I find it difficult to comprehend the fact that here we have two councils in south-east Essex publicly in favour of controversial development.

I can only hope voters exercise their right to remove any councillors found negligent in their duty of care regarding the interests of residents rather than pandering to the needs of environmentally ruinous planning applications such as that being proposed by organisations like the Stobart Group.

Kieran Kelly
Southend Road
Rochford

…Once again I have been amazed by the attitude of our elected councillors.

This time it is Lib Dem Mike Grimwade who is the representative of the area most affected by the airport’s expansion.

His attitude seems to be he will make his own mind up, notwithstanding what the majority of his voters think, and will then not tell us which way he has voted.

There can only be one reason for this – he is scared of being voted out of office. What a spineless approach. Stand up and be counted, Mr Grimwade.

I can understand this attitude from our council leader, Nigel Holdcroft, but I always thought the Liberals were better than this. Leigh ward’s Lib Dem Alan Crystall certainly is.

Tony Halls
Westborough Road
Westcliff