Archive for January, 2010

Councillors approve runway extension in face of overwhelming public opposition

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Southend Borough Council’s Development Control Committee met this afternoon to approve planning permission for a longer runway at London Southend Airport. Airport owners, Stobart, want the extension to enable growth of the airport to two million passengers per year.

Forty-four members of the public had registered to address the Committee but under Council rules only one is allowed to speak. Immediately prior to the meeting, SAEN Chairman, Kiti Theobald, was selected to represent the views of the public in opposing the planning application. Her speech was welcomed with enthusiastic applause from the public gallery, to which the chairman of the Development Control Committee, Brian Kelly, took exception. It was notable that no such objections were forthcoming three minutes later when airport employees who had been brought in on a Stobart coach applauded Alastair Welch, the airport’s managing director.

After Cllrs Flewitt and Wexham addressed the Development Control Committee as ordinary councillors, it was the turn of the Development Control members themselves. Lib Dem Councillor for St Laurence, Ted Lewin, highlighted his concerns about night flights and tabled a motion for the airport to be closed between midnight and 6am. Planning officers quickly persuaded him to withdraw the motion and Mr Lewin’s concerns clearly weren’t that great as he went on to vote in favour of the planning application.

Cllr Godwin, Lib Dem for Leigh, who had stepped in to replace Cllr Crystall on the committee, raised concerns about parking facilities at the airport, which he felt were inadequate. He also challenged officers on increased emissions from cars travelling to and from the airport but missed the elephant in the room, namely emissions from the planes themselves.

Two members, Cllrs Horrigan and Robertson, wasted the Committee’s time complaining about emails they said they had received from constituents pointing out that if they voted in favour of the planning application they may be held to account at the ballot box. It seemed to come as a surprise to both of them that they were democratically accountable.

After three and a half hours, the Development Control Committee voted 14 to 3 in favour of approving the planning application.

Spokesman for SAEN, Denis Walker said: “In all tests of public opinion, whether it be the JAAP consultation or the responses to the planning application, there has always been an overwhelming majority opposed to the runway extension. It is unfortunate that most Councillors prefer to ignore their electors in pursuit of a scheme that even if successful, will only line the pockets of the airport owners. It will do nothing to contribute to the wider local economy and will blight the lives of local residents.”

The decision now rests with the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, John Denham MP, whether to accept the Committee’s findings or to call the application in for his own determination following a Public Inquiry.

ENDS.

Notes to Editors

“Stop Airport Extension Now” (SAEN) was formed to campaign against the runway extension at Southend Airport. The group is not opposed to the Airport itself, which has co-existed with the residents of Southend for many years. SAEN is against the runway extension, which would lead to a massive increase in flights and destroy the lives of the people living, working or going to school anywhere near the flightpath.

Government Minister must approve extension of runway

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

THE expansion of Southend Airport will not go ahead without the approval of a Government minister, it has been announced.

Even if Southend Council approves the plan to extend the runway across Eastwoodbury Lane, it will still need the go-ahead from Government Minister John Denham.

Mr Denham, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, will either approve the plan or call it in for a public inquiry.

The council’s development control committee is meeting today to discuss the plans. If the committee refuses the application, the plans are dead. [Not strictly true, as the airport could appeal the decision.]

But if it is approved, the decision is put on hold until the Secretary of State decides he will not intervene or he decides to “call in” the application.

This means there would be a public inquiry about the plan, chaired by a Government planning inspector.

The Secretary of State is not required to reach a decision with any specific timescale, but aims to deal with it “as quickly as possible”.

Anti-expansion pressure group Stop Airport [Extension] Now welcomed the news.

Spokesman Denis Walker said: “The direction means it’s much more likely there will be a public inquiry and that’s good news.

“This is what we’ve been asking for ever since the planning application was submitted.

“Leaving this decision to Southend Council means there wouldn’t be proper scrutiny of it.

“Without a public inquiry, there would be no cross-examination of evidence or full scrutiny in public.

“This major decision would be left entirely in the hands of a process designed to approve extensions to houses.”

Inquiry delay would be ‘frustrating’

THE leader of Southend Council said he is concerned plans to expand the airport could be delayed by the Government’s decision.

Tory leader Nigel Holdcroft said: “There was always the possibility the Government would issue the directive, therefore, it doesn’t come as a great surprise.

“Obviously, the application will still be considered on its merits by the development control team.

“Hopefully, the Secretary of State reviews the situation promptly and decides as quickly as possible to call the matter in if the committee approves it.

“If it’s called in for a public inquiry, it would lead to a significant delay which the airport organisers would find very frustrating.”

Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate for Southend West, Peter Welch, said he welcomed the Government’s decision.

About John Denham

JOHN Denham is the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.

Mr Denham, 56, has been Labour MP for Southampton Itchen since 1992 and has been the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government since June.

He recently hit the headlines for claiming class was a more significant factor in 21st-century Britain than race.

Lib Dems cleared to land votes on Southend runway

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

OPPOSITION councillors have been given the all-clear to vote on crucial plans to expand Southend Airport following an investigation.

Last month, Tory councillor Tony Cox called for the Liberal Democrats to be barred from voting on the planning application to extend the airport’s runway.

Mr Cox intervened because he feared Lib Dem councillors had already made up their minds over the plan, which their leader Graham Longley had announced his party was opposed to.

Mr Cox was worried that if the Lib Dems vote on the Stobart Group’s £30million development plans, then Southend Council could face legal action by the airport owners and a judicial review of its decision.

Strict rules govern councillors, which prevent them being for or against any planning application before it is heard.

However, John Williams, the council’s head of legal and democratic services, looked into the issue and has now agreed Lib Dems can vote.

Mr Longley said: “What the borough solicitor said is that none of my statements show predetermination and I’m obviously pleased.

“It’s disappointing councillor Cox didn’t feel the advice I gave him at the time about this was correct. He’s spent ratepayers’ money unnecessarily.”

However, Mr Cox, who represents West Shoebury, said: “It would have cost the council thousands of pounds if the matter had gone to judicial review, so it needed clarifying.

“I think he should have known better than to make the comments he did. I still think he has predetermined the issue, but the legal department said otherwise and I have to go with that.”

The airport’s expansion plans will be voted on at a meeting of the development control committee today.

Demonstrators oppose runway extension at Southend Airport

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

PRESS RELEASE

For: 20th January 2010
Demonstrators oppose Southend Airport runway extension

PHOTO OPPORTUNITY
Demonstrators gather on the steps of Southend Civic Centre prior to the afternoon’s Development Control Committee meeting. This meeting will decide whether to approve a planning application to extend the runway at Southend Airport.

When: 10:30am, 20th January 2010
Venue: Southend Civic Centre, Victoria Avenue, Southend-on-Sea
Contact: Denis Walker, Press Officer, Stop Airport Extension Now – denis@saen.org.uk

At 2pm on 20th January, Southend Borough Council’s Development Control Committee will meet to decide whether to grant planning permission for a longer runway at London Southend Airport. Airport owners, Stobart, want the extension to enable growth of the airport to two million passengers per year.

However, on Monday, the Government Office for the East of England issued an Article 14 Direction to Southend Borough Council, requiring them to refer the application to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, John Denham MP. This Direction prevents the Council from issuing their decision on whether or not to grant planning permission until the Secretary of State has had the opportunity to consider whether the application is one that he should call in for his own determination.

“This is welcome news,” said Denis Walker, Press Officer for SAEN – the campaign group formed to oppose the lengthening of the runway at Southend Airport. “Ever since the planning application was submitted, we have been calling for a Public Inquiry to investigate it properly and this is the first step to getting one.”

“The planning application was submitted part way through the consultation process for a Joint Area Action Plan to determine the future of the airport and its environs. We argue that until this Action Plan is finalised, any decision to extend the runway is premature.”

ENDS.

Notes to Editors

“Stop Airport Extension Now” (SAEN) was formed to campaign against the runway extension at Southend Airport. The group is not opposed to the Airport itself, which has co-existed with the residents of Southend for many years. SAEN is against the runway extension, which would lead to a massive increase in flights and destroy the lives of the people living, working or going to school anywhere near the flightpath.

For further information:

  • Contact Denis Walker, Press Officer SAEN (Stop Airport Extension Now), denis@saen.org.uk
  • Visit the SAEN website – http://saen.org.uk/

Southend Airport runway plan hits legal hurdle

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Plans to extend Southend Airport runway in Essex have hit a legal hurdle which could delay the start of work.

The government has blocked Southend Borough Council granting planning permission without authorisation by the Secretary of State John Denham.

The development control committee is due to consider the plans on Wednesday.

If the scheme is approved the decision will be frozen and the plans will go before Mr Denham who could decide to call a public inquiry.

A borough council spokesman said: “The Secretary of State may then decide not to intervene and send the application back to the council to issue a decision notice.

“If the secretary of state decides to call in the application a public inquiry will be held.”

If the planning application is rejected by the borough council then a decision notice will be issued in the usual way.

Southend Airport plan: Government intervenes

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

THE expansion of Southend Airport will not go ahead without the authorisation of a Government minister, it has been announced

Communities Secretary John Denham has issued an Article 14 Direction about the planning application to extend the runway at London Southend Airport.

The effect of the direction is to prevent Southend Council granting planning permission on the application without his authorisation.

The application will still be considered at Development Control Committee at 2pm tomorrow.

If the committee decides to approve the application this decision will be frozen until either:

The Secretary of State decides that he will not intervene and sends the application back to the council, in which case the decision notice will be issued
the Secretary of State decides to call-in the application for his determination, in which case there will be a Public Inquiry.

Noise is protesters’ main concern

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

NOISE is the biggest concern among objectors with all but a handful of the 1,400 responses citing it as a worry.

It relates mainly to flights, particularly at night, and a big increase in traffic.

The airport says the extension of the runway would mean larger but quieter, more modern aircraft and approximately three-quarters of aircraft would arrive at the Rochford end over largely undeveloped land, with the rest over Leigh.

The results of a noise assessment submitted by the applicant conclude that there would only be a three decibel increase as a result of the planned new flights[, revealing that what they say about the larger aircraft being quieter is untrue].

Southend Airport has put forward a number of proposed measured to placate residents, including fines if limits are exceeded, a limit on night flights [with exclusions for quota count exempt aircraft], no night helicopter flights, and a grant scheme to provide noise insulation for nearby homes, schools and healthcare buildings.

The report says more properties would fall within the public safety zones of ‘tolerable’ risk, including Blenheim School.

This means that future extensions to the school building for the purposes of increasing pupil capacity would be capped.

Is runway approval a foregone conclusion at Southend Airport?

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

As soon as Stobart submitted their planning application to extend the runway at London Southend Airport, some people said that the outcome was a foregone conclusion. They could be accused of being cynical, but the evidence is now mounting that they were right.

Firstly, there is the evidence of the second phase of Joint Area Action Plan (JAAP) consultation, which ignored the majority of respondents to Phase 1 and nominated the least popular proposal as the Councils’ preferred option.[1] The full analysis of the Phase 2 consultation will not be published until after the Development Control Committee have made their decision. Were it not for SAEN’s[2] Freedom of Information request, which was only granted on appeal to the Information Commissioner, not even the raw numbers of objectors and supporters would be available[3] and yet they show that well over three quarters of respondents opposed the runway extension.

Then there is the evidence of the shambolic state of the planning application file where legitimate objections were being discounted for no discernible reason, objections and invalid responses were being counted as support and supporting comments were being counted twice.[4] There was even one example where a respondent had supplied nothing more than their name and address and was counted as supporting the application.

We now also have the evidence of the Officers’ Report[5], published on 13th January, which recommends that the planning application be approved – in many cases solely on the evidence of the Airport owners with no independent analysis. The report is biased in its analysis of the comments received. It says that “strong support has been shown by a number of local employers” and names seven examples, six of which are in the aviation industry. No details are provided about companies that objected to the planning application.

The Officers’ Report refers to “The Planning System – General Principles”[6] which “advises that unless the proposed development is so significant it would prejudice [a Development Plan Document, such as the JAAP] a refusal on prematurity grounds should not be necessary.”[7] However, the extension of the runway at Southend Airport is the central tenet of the proposals detailed in Phase 2 of the JAAP consultation. A decision to approve the planning application would therefore prejudice the JAAP. This means that the planning application must be rejected to allow the JAAP process to run its course. The Report acknowledges that the development under consideration in the planning application is “significant”[8] then immediately goes on to dismiss it as “only one aspect of the development of the airport…” and proceeds to advise Councillors that “It is not considered the proposal should be refused on grounds of prematurity.”[9]

The Development Control Committee meets to decide the planning application at 2pm on Wednesday 20th January at Southend Civic Centre.

ENDS.

Notes for Editors

[1] “Despite some support, the majority of respondents were opposed to Scenario 3. There was significant opposition to Scenario 3, particularly, but not exclusively, from members of the public.” – Analysis of responses to Phase 1 of JAAP Consultation, page 15: http://www.rochford.gov.uk/PDF/JAAP_%20issues_and_options_summary_consultation_response.pdf

[2] “Stop Airport Extension Now” (SAEN) was formed to campaign against the runway extension at Southend Airport. The group is not opposed to the Airport itself, which has co-existed with the residents of Southend for many years. SAEN is against the runway extension, which would lead to a massive increase in flights and destroy the lives of the people living, working or going to school anywhere near the flightpath.

[3] http://www.rochford.gov.uk/pdf/JAAP_representations_summary.pdf

[4] SAEN’s concerns have been outlined in a letter to the Council at http://www.saen.org.uk/2010/01/errors-in-planning-depts-handling-of-the-planning-application/ For privacy, the letter has been edited to remove the names of respondents. The planning application (ref 09/01960/FULM) comments files are available to view at Southend Borough Council by appointment. Call the Southend Borough Council Planning Department for an appointment on 01702 215328

[5] http://minutes.southend.gov.uk/akssouthend/images/att16846.doc

[6] http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/147396.pdf

[7] Point 4.1.35 of [4]

[8] Point 4.1.36 of [4]

[9] Point 4.1.37 of [4]

For further information:

* Call Denis Walker, Press Officer, SAEN (Stop Airport Extension Now)
* Visit the SAEN website – http://saen.org.uk/

Planning Dept Report now available

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

The report by Council Officers has now been published and is available on the Southend Council website.

SAEN’s analysis to follow…

Airport plan cannot be prejudged

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

I read with interest councillor Ted Lewin’s attitude to Southend development control committee, of which he is a member.

The committee will be dealing with one of the most important applications for the development of Southend Airport, the opportunity to provide jobs and an airport for local passengers.

He posed a number of questions, the answers to which we would all like, namely the extra stress on roads, the diversion of Eastwoodbury Lane, night flights, noise and pollution and the effect of the runway extension on St Laurence church.

The theme behind the letter was politics and I feel he has had too much to say in advance to make an unbiased decision on the day. Why write anything when members are supposed to keep an open mind on planning applications and place their vote on council officers’ recommendations, the debate in committee and representations from residents?

How can he prejudge what will happen on the day? What evidence does he have that the Conservatives are going to vote in favour of the application regardless.

What evidence does he have that Stobart is putting pressure on members to ensure its plans to invest in our airport are agreed?

David Garston
Conservative Candidate, St Laurence Ward
Maplin Way North
Southend