Archive for January, 2010

Tory MP urges minister to act swiftly over Southend Airport plan

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

A TORY MP put pressure on a Government minister to make a swift decision over Southend Airport’s £30million expansion plans.

James Duddridge questioned Communities Secretary John Denham in the Commons after the controversial proposals to extend the airport runway were backed by Southend Council’s development control committee.

Before the plan was considered, Mr Denham decided to take the final decision away from the council and either give the go-ahead, or call a public inquiry to scrutinise the plan.

Speaking in the Commons, Mr Duddridge, Rochford and Southend East MP, urged Mr Denham to consider the plan quickly and make a decision.

He told the minister: “It would be helpful to the local community if he could tell us roughly when he will make a decision on that matter, and whether there will be a need for a public inquiry. The sooner the better.”

However, Mr Denham would not be drawn on the issue and said it was inappropriate to comment.

Airport operator, the Stobart Group, hopes to have the runway extension complete to take advantage of the 2012 London Olympics.

Airport expansion is approved by council

Friday, January 29th, 2010

PLANS to expand Southend Airport have been backed by an overwhelming majority of the town’s planning councillors.

Following a tense, packed-out development control meeting, which lasted more than three and a half hours, councillors voted 14 to three in favour of the plans.

The application from Southend Airport was to extend the runway by 300m, divert Eastwoodbury Lane and demolish six houses. Bosses hope the expansion will allow 25,000 passenger flights a year, up from 800.

About 150 members of the public squeezed into the council chamber to listen to councillors debate the merits of the plan. Tensions boiled over at times, with applause for some speakers and jeers and boos for others.

Those in favour of the application emphasised the economic benefits they felt the expansion could bring to Southend, especially in light of recent job losses at HSBC and Eon in Rayleigh.

The Stop Airport [Extension] Now chairman Kiti Theobald laid out her opposition at the start, which was followed by a round of applause.

Airport managing director Alastair Welch also provoked applause [from his employees], though more muted, when he spoke in favour of the application.

Labour leader David Norman (Lab, Victoria) said: “In my time on the council, I can’t think of a single issue where we’ve all had so many emails and letters.

“This town faces a very precarious future, with a relative decline in influence and jobs. That can only get worse unless we bring regeneration to the town. The alternative is stagnation.”

Barry Godwin (Lib Dem, Leigh), who opposed the plan, said: “I’m not against progress, but neither is it a question of expansion at any cost. This will have an impact on Southend in terms of road congestion for tjose living in the east of the town, and noise and pollution for those in the west.”

But a final decision on the runway extension lies in the hands of the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, John Denham.

Mr Denham made an order on Monday that he will decide whether the application should be decided by a public inquiry, which could take months, or if he will go along with the council’s decision.

Southend Airport Joint Area Action Plan meeting postponed

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

A meeting to decide the economic future of a large swathe of land surrounding Southend Airport has been postponed until a decision is made on a public inquiry.

More than 7,000 jobs could be created with ambitious plans to enlarge the airport and redevelop the surrounding area with new business parks, but though Southend Council has approved the runway expansion, the Secretary of State must first decide whether to hold a public inquiry.

Because of this, Rochford and Southend Councils issued a joint statement saying the a meeting to discuss the Joint Area Action Plan on February 3 must be put on hold.

Keith Hudson, Rochford’s councillor for planning and transportation, called for a speedy decision on the plans or job opportunities would be lost.

Airport’s Expansion ready by next year

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

SOUTHEND Airport’s expansion could be operational in 2011, if government approves the runway extension plans.

Alistair Welch, managing director of the airport, confirmed a detailed timescale for the £30million project was in place.

If the Secretary of State goes with Southend Council’s recommendation to approve the 300m extension, then work will begin immediately on the airport.

More than 6,700 jobs will[, it has been claimed,] be made available while larger, [allegedly]more environmentally friendly planes will carry both leisure and business passengers across Europe.

Mr Welch believes 2,520 people could be working at the airport by 2020 if the plans go ahead.

He said: “The development of the airport will transform the economic prospects for Southend, introducing to the economy a stimulus and source of growth and job opportunities.

“While there is much to do, we are working hard to ensure we have a fully functioning regional airport in place in time for the 2012 Olympics.”

The first development work to take place would be 700m of new road to replace links diverted from Eastwoodbury Lane.

This work is expected to start during the summer[, assuming that approval is given].

Work on the runway extension [would] only start once the ‘road network’ has been completed in early 2011 and is expected to take six months to build.

New navigation aids for aircraft [would] also be installed during the construction programme to improve safety and security on site.

Other projects include the new rail station and control tower.

Romford firm Readie Construction started work on the tower on Monday and is expected to finish it by the end of this year.

The new train station, which has links to [is on] the National Express line via Liverpool Street, is expected to open in the summer.

The airport is hoping to make announcements on what flight operators will be running from Southend over the coming months.

Councillors press ahead with airport

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

PLANS to expand Southend Airport’s runway have been backed by councillors, but will need Government approval before going ahead.

Southend Council’s development control committee voted in favour of Stobart Group’s proposal to increase the runway by 300m on Wednesday.

Members also agreed to plans for the diversion of Eastwoodbury Lane and the demolishment of six cottages along the road.

The recommendation will now be sent to Communities Secretary, John Denham, who can either agree with Southend Council’s decision or call for a public inquiry.

The airport’s managing director, Alastair Welch, welcomed the news.

He said: “We are please that members of Southend Council, having listened to the views of all sections of the local community, have approved proposals for the runway extension.

“We believe the arguments in favour of the extension are compelling, and we trust that the minister who will review this project recognises the urgent need to progress with it to allow Southend to showcase what it does best in time for the 2012 Olympics.”

Anti-expansion protestors aired their views before the meeting, but councillors voted 14-3 in favour of the proposal.

The authority had received more than 1,460 objections to the plans and 549 in support.

Campaigner Denis Walker, from Stop Airport [Extension] Now, criticised the committee for ‘ignoring overwhelming public opposition’.

He said: “It is unfortunate that most councillors prefer to ignore their electors in pursuit of a scheme that even if successful, will only line the pockets of the airport owners.

“It will do nothing to contribute to the local economy and will blight the lives of residents.”

Rochford and Southend East MP, James Duddridge, supported the council’s decision but feels the plans will be held up by Government.

The Conservative said: “This is an un-missable opportunity for Southend.

“If the Secretary of State decides to call in the application for his determination, then there will be a public inquiry.

“I fear this would be severely detrimental to the progress of plans to develop the airport, which are vital to ensure the growth of Southend’s economy.”

To find out more about the expansion plans visit [the airport's expansion propaganda website].

‘We listend to everyone’s views’

SOUTHEND Council members have claimed they listened to all views before backing Southend Airport’s runway expansion.

Councillor Brian Kelly (Con, Shoebury), who chaired the meeting, said: “Members took into account both the needs of the airport operator and the views of all sections of the local community.

“The committee resolved to approve the application, subject to an agreement and conditions to limit the airport’s impacts on residents.”

However, Councillor Mike Grimwade (Lib Dem, Prittlewell) was disappointed.

He voted against the runway along with councillors Barry Godwin and Jim Clinkscales.

He said: “We knew between us there would be a difference of opinion, as expected.

“It was clear from previous votes that the plans would be agreed by the council.

“My biggest concern is the airport’s impact on the A127, so I am now campaigning to get improvements on the road.”

Airport a ‘Done Deal’

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

From: Garry Sheen, prospective Independent candidate, Belfairs ward, Boyce Hill Close, Leigh

I agree with Coun Peter Wexham (Leigh Times Jan 12) that the decision to expand Southend Airport’s runway is probably a ‘done deal’. However, we will all discover whether this is true following the development control committee meeting due to be held last week.

It is a travesty that a planning application which will ahve such a dramatic impact on local residents’ lives, is being decided upon by only a maximum of 17 councillors – although a minimum of nine could decide. This should certainly have been voted on by all 51 councillors.

Although I am certainly not anti-airport in any way, shape or form, I do not believe the extension of the runway is in the best interests of residents; and definitely not those who live under or near the flight path.

From may Belfairs residents I have spoken with, thre appears to be a significant body of opposition to the extension. As a Leigh resident, I most definitely share those concerns.

The main concerns have been reported on in some detail, by the Leigh Times and I do not intend to go into a long diatribe about these. Suffice to say: increase in noise from additional air traffic – especially night time freight flights – damage to environment from greenhouse gases; lack of infrastructure (road systems); damaging effect on young children’s learning ability for those in schools near to the airport and likely effect on property prices.

Airport delay

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Council agree – but Minister steps in

TWO Leigh Liberal Democrat councillors won a ‘battle’ to delay the airport expansion scheme – but now wait to see if they have won the ‘war’.

Couns Alan Crystall and Peter Wexham both wrote to John Denham, the Communities Secretary of State, along with, it is understood a letter from the campaign group, SAEN – Stop Airport [Extension] Now – and he has said no expansion should commence until he has studied all the papers and decided whether to leave it with Southend Council to decide or order a public inquiry.

In the meantime, though, Southend Council’s development control committee decided last week by 14 votes to three to give their approval to the airport’s expansion scheme application – which includes a 300m extension of the runway to enable it to take passenger jets.

Now the airport, council and objectors wait to see what Mr Denham says.

He has promised to deal with the issue quickly – but all sides are mindful that there is only a three-month ‘window’ for him to announce his decision.

An election is likely on May 6 – but it will be called at least three weeks earlier, and if he has not made his decision by then it could be some months before a new administration gets round to looking at the issue.

In his letter to Southend Council – published in full on page 14 – Mr Denham said because he had received representations against the plan he had asked to see all the papers.

Coun Crystall’s intervention was particularly relevant because he is one of the leading planning spokesmen in the Eastern Region.

Don’t mention the runway!

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

A touch of Fawlty at the airport debate

Report by Michael Guy

The size of the majority was bigger than most expected – 14 votes to three.

When it was announced after a four-hour debate in the Southend Council chamber last Wednesday there was surprisingly a loud volume of applause to welcome it. [Due, no doubt, to the coach-load of Stobart employees bussed in to the meeting]

Previously, though, the objectors in the public gallery, packed with almost 200 members of the public, had made the most noise as the speakers against the airport’s expansion plans made their points – so much so, in fact , that on three occasions the chairman of the development control committee, Coun Brian Kelly had to warn them that he might have to clear the gallery if they continued with their interventions.

The actual debate on the airport’s application to extend the runway was a strange one – and reminded one very much of a Basil Fawlty episode when he had German guests staying in Fawlty Towers and he ordered his staff: “Don’t mention the war….I mentioned it once, but I think I got away with it.”

So with the runway extension. I don’t think any of the councillors on the committee who spoke in the debate actually mentioned the runway – the R word.

Thorpe Bay Coun Ron Woodley mentioned the width of the cycle paths. Other councillors spent more time than was necessary talking about the nasty emails they had received – even threatening them with defeat at forthcoming elections!

There were some eloquent contributions from the likes of Coun David Norman, leader of the Labour group on the council, but even he didn’t mention the R word.

There were many reminiscences about the dear old Bristol freighters that used the airport as councillor after councillor skirted around the real issue.

In fact, it was almost impossible to tell how each of the speakers were going to vote. Nobody seemed to want to get the real issue by the scruff of the neck and give firm arguments for and against.

Lib Dem Coun Ted Lewin seemed at one stage to have found a strong legitimate argument with night flights – and even got to the point of even suggesting that he would recommend that the airport should close each night from midnight to 6am. His Lib Dem colleague, Coun Jim Clinkscales, from Blenheim ward, said he would second it, nut this was not followed up, denying the Lib Dems of a strong point when it comes to fighting the May council elections.

He appeared to be put off when planning officer Andrew Meddle pointed out that it would not be viable for the airport to stay open at night for emergency landings – even though it was pointed out that nearby London City Airport closes at night.

That was the nearest the opponents to the expansion plans came to landing a killer punch.

The most outspoken contributions came from speakers outside of the committee.

Leigh Coun Peter Wexham, who is not a committee member but was allowed to speak, said the officers’ report had glossed over the real problems to make the application look so good.

“It is not what is in the report rather than what isn’t,” was his comment that drew loud applause from the gallery and prompted Coun Kelly to issue his first warning to the members of the public.

“Instead of taking a coach trip to the airport, for a site visit” he said, “the members of the committee should have gone to Blenheim School and seen the effect when a plane flew over.”

He also reminded the committee that when London City Airport was first opened they said they would not have jets using the airport. “Look at what has happened since,” he said.

Kiti Theobald, who is chair of the Stop Airport [Extension] Now (SAEN), spoke of the disruption to school lessons, too, and said the town needed a new hospital more than a runway.

“There is no shame in letting this application go to a public inquiry,” she maintained.

Alistair Welch, managing director of the airport, said the town badly needed a generator of new jobs, particularly with the news that morning that the energy giant, E.on were closing their Rayleigh office with the loss of 600 jobs.

He said the airport would be in an ideal position to provide a service for the 2012 Olympics – and showcase the town during the period.

Independent Coun Mike Assenheim pointed out that most of the properties affected by the airport in Leigh had written into their deeds the fact that they were under the flight path.

“Why are they now carping?” he asked.

Labour Coun David Norman, who lives in Leigh, but represents Victoria ward in Southend, asked what was the alternative to the airport expansion? – “Stagnation,” he replied. “It could close and become an estate of bungalows with DIY stores. If the airport prospers, the town will.”

Leigh Lib Dem Coun Barry Godwin, who stood in for his colleague, Coun Alan Crystall who was barred from taking part in the debate because of his declared opposition to the airport’s plans, led the opposition within the committee, pointing out that 2,335 people in Leigh would be brought into the noise risk zone, and even with the number of landings over Leigh being reduced to 50% of the total traffic there would be huge problems.

His Lib Dem colleague, Coun Mike Grimwade said he had grave misgivings about a possible traffic snarl-up, and was concerned about the possibility of an aircraft coming down so close to schools in Leigh.

West Leigh Tory Coun Gwen Horrigan, said she had lived under the flight path for 50 years and even when the airport was the third busiest in the UK there was no traffic congestion – even though the road network was not as good as it was today. [She of course ignored the fact that even at its height, the airport never handled two million passengers per year.]

She was in favour of the expansion because of the job opportunities it would give to the town’s youngsters, badly needed now, and for the opportunity it would give the oldr people of having an airport on their doorstep – instead of having to drive for two and a half hours to the next nearest. [Even though it actually takes just over an hour to get to Stansted]

Blenheim Lib Dem Coun Jim Clinkscales, a former airline executive, said all airlines were in a desperate mess at present and he couldn’t see the need for the expansion.

Three Lib Dem councillors voted against – Barry Godwin, Mike Grimwade and Jim Clinkscales. But none of them, as with the other speakers, ever mentioned the R word. [And the fact that Ted Lewin - the other Lib Dem councillor on the development control committee - voted in favour of the planning application in spite of his many serious reservations not being addressed, remains unexplained.]

Protesters make final stand before decision

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

SAEN Protesters with "No Runway Extension" banner

Leading the opposition - members of the Stop Airport Extension Now group protest outside the Civic Centre


PROTESTERS voiced their opposition one last time before Southend Council made its decision over the expansion of the airport.

Waving a banner, the group of about 15, made their feelings known to the council’s development control committee, before members voted.

The scheme to extend the runway across Eastwoodbury Lane and push the airport as a major passenger terminal have proved contentious, with scores of public meetings and more than 1,400 objections from individuals and organisations.

Protesters from the group Stop Airport [Extension] Now, braved the January chill to make their feelings known outside the Civic Centre in Victoria Avenue. Protester Jackie Miles, 53, of Marine Parade, Leigh, said: “I will be right under the flight path and I just don’t think it is right to have an airport in such a densely populated area.

“I hope it gets called in by the Secretary of State, It’s all we can hope for and is our last chance.”

Niqui Denkmayer, 60, of Eastwood Road, Leigh, also joined the protest.

She said: “I don’t think the airport is viable. We have had huge property developments since the 1960s, so the planes will be flying over a densely populated area.

“The planes already fly over our house, so they can’t tell me it doesn’t make a noise, because it does.”

Also protesting was Brenda Meachen, 81, who has lived in Leigh for 56 years and believes the airport will eventually become a base for commercial cargo flights.

Mrs Meachen, of Westcliff Drive, added: “The infrastructure here just can’t take any more traffic. It’s terrible already.”

Leigh Lib Dem councillor Alan Crystall joined the protesters and said he did not regret forfeiting his place on the development control committee in order to speak out about his opposition to the plans.

Denis Walker, spokesman from the Stop Airport [Extension Now] group, said: “It doesn’t really matter what today’s outcome is until the Secretary of State has commented.

“Hopefully we will get proper scrutiny on this. If there was a public inquiry there would be the chance to cross-examine the people involved. The council doesn’t have the expertise to decide on this.”

Councillors approve runway extension in face of overwhelming public opposition

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Southend Borough Council’s Development Control Committee met this afternoon to approve planning permission for a longer runway at London Southend Airport. Airport owners, Stobart, want the extension to enable growth of the airport to two million passengers per year.

Forty-four members of the public had registered to address the Committee but under Council rules only one is allowed to speak. Immediately prior to the meeting, SAEN Chairman, Kiti Theobald, was selected to represent the views of the public in opposing the planning application. Her speech was welcomed with enthusiastic applause from the public gallery, to which the chairman of the Development Control Committee, Brian Kelly, took exception. It was notable that no such objections were forthcoming three minutes later when airport employees who had been brought in on a Stobart coach applauded Alastair Welch, the airport’s managing director.

After Cllrs Flewitt and Wexham addressed the Development Control Committee as ordinary councillors, it was the turn of the Development Control members themselves. Lib Dem Councillor for St Laurence, Ted Lewin, highlighted his concerns about night flights and tabled a motion for the airport to be closed between midnight and 6am. Planning officers quickly persuaded him to withdraw the motion and Mr Lewin’s concerns clearly weren’t that great as he went on to vote in favour of the planning application.

Cllr Godwin, Lib Dem for Leigh, who had stepped in to replace Cllr Crystall on the committee, raised concerns about parking facilities at the airport, which he felt were inadequate. He also challenged officers on increased emissions from cars travelling to and from the airport but missed the elephant in the room, namely emissions from the planes themselves.

Two members, Cllrs Horrigan and Robertson, wasted the Committee’s time complaining about emails they said they had received from constituents pointing out that if they voted in favour of the planning application they may be held to account at the ballot box. It seemed to come as a surprise to both of them that they were democratically accountable.

After three and a half hours, the Development Control Committee voted 14 to 3 in favour of approving the planning application.

Spokesman for SAEN, Denis Walker said: “In all tests of public opinion, whether it be the JAAP consultation or the responses to the planning application, there has always been an overwhelming majority opposed to the runway extension. It is unfortunate that most Councillors prefer to ignore their electors in pursuit of a scheme that even if successful, will only line the pockets of the airport owners. It will do nothing to contribute to the wider local economy and will blight the lives of local residents.”

The decision now rests with the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, John Denham MP, whether to accept the Committee’s findings or to call the application in for his own determination following a Public Inquiry.

ENDS.

Notes to Editors

“Stop Airport Extension Now” (SAEN) was formed to campaign against the runway extension at Southend Airport. The group is not opposed to the Airport itself, which has co-existed with the residents of Southend for many years. SAEN is against the runway extension, which would lead to a massive increase in flights and destroy the lives of the people living, working or going to school anywhere near the flightpath.